Proof swamp-thing won't be in injustice? My best answer to this question is a big green guy who kicks ass and has crazy powers.who is swamp thing besides the dude in the 80's movie?
Swamp Thing is either a plant-elemental with the memories and personality of the scientist Alec Holland or Alec Holland transformed into a plant-elemental. He has super strength, can essentially control plantlife, transport himself over distances by inhabiting other plantlife. Essentially, has some of the same powers as Poison Ivy, but is good and actually does care about humanity.who is swamp thing besides the dude in the 80's movie?
You see I think they shouldn't make a game to sell and make a game that is actually good and not just a market handjob with characters who have no business being there like some of you think is how they should do it. So what if Bane brings in more people than Swamp Thing? They should not mold their game around ratings, ratings should mold around a game.
More than just character selection determines how good a game will be. Every game ever made is made to sell.You see I think they shouldn't make a game to sell and make a game that is actually good and not just a market handjob with characters who have no business being there like some of you think is how they should do it. So what if Bane brings in more people than Swamp Thing? They should not mold their game around ratings, ratings should mold around a game.
But that shouldn't be the number one. That shouldn't be their number one priority. Rocksteady did the same with Arkham City. They hyped the game to be something it was not only to meet their quota. These companies should be focused on making a good game. I mean of course they want to sell but they shouldn't say, "Oh my god. This character this character will make us millions. Let's put him in."Meeting sales quota is number one. But someone like Bane doesn't bring in a large amount of sales so yeah, he can be replaced.
sales keep them making game.But that shouldn't be the number one. That shouldn't be their number one priority. Rocksteady did the same with Arkham City. They hyped the game to be something it was not only to meet their quota. These companies should be focused on making a good game. I mean of course they want to sell but they shouldn't say, "Oh my god. This character this character will make us millions. Let's put him in."
But that shouldn't be the number one. That shouldn't be their number one priority. Rocksteady did the same with Arkham City. They hyped the game to be something it was not only to meet their quota. These companies should be focused on making a good game. I mean of course they want to sell but they shouldn't say, "Oh my god. This character this character will make us millions. Let's put him in."
It's an alt so it would be easy to fix her face for this particular costume.that face is better, right? or we have to wait to see it animated
i like her alternates so far, they don't look badIt's an alt so it would be easy to fix her face for this particular costume.
They're probably not going to fix the main costume though, it would be a lot of work because she is intergrated into cutscenes already.
I also don't think her alt is that bad either. Costume hides the shoulders, and cheekbones.
Pig disgusting Jim Lee art. Cliff Chiang's version is way better.