@sub_on_dubs
And Defund the Police. God this is irritating that I have to explain this over and over and over.
"Defund The Police" generally means one of two things.
Option 1 Title: Hit Them In The Pocket
Premise: The police are given too much unilateral power and scope when it comes to punishment. Any problems that arise in the police force are dealt with by, you guessed it, other members in that same program. So, if police officers do foul stuff on the job, the only people to call them out for it are other people within their unit. So if they decide not to do anything about it,
nothing gets done.
Proposition: Reduce the amount of money the police (and some people believe military as well) receive, and force them to enact guidelines and policies that makes them behave how we want them to, and actually having accountability for their actions before getting that money back. Since their ability to actually follow these policies and follow these guidelines would directly relate to how much they'd get paid, this would be effective in keeping them honest.
Option 2 Title: Retrain Them
and/or Add A New Task Force
Premise: The police force is too often the only resort most people have when faced with ANY situation for which you could call help, but the police are not trained well enough to deal with all situations for which they might be called.
For example, if a homeless person is squatting (breaking into and living in a house without paying), the ONLY people to call are the police.
Another, if a person is wandering through the streets yelling/crying/screaming, the only resource is 911.
If a woman is in a place screaming and crying at her newborn baby, you dial the police. But the police only know that they need to arrive on scene and take whoever it is into custody, and attack them if things escalate. Not to mention that they are often times not trained to deal with people who are deaf, mute, autistic, legally blind, schizophrenic, etc. as the list goes on and on. That's... about it.
Proposition: Take some of the money that is spent on the police (and sometimes people believe military) and spend it to retrain police, making their training more applicable to the situations that they will find themselves in, so that they can deescalate the situations or be able to understand things a lot better. Or they can take that money and start an entirely new task force with potentially a new number to dial, so that the people deployed would be, say, social workers, licensed therapists, etc. etc.
In the situation of the homeless person, instead of being arrested for trespassing, the new task force would be able to deploy people who would be able to get that person into a homeless shelter so that they can be more comfortable, as well as getting them the tools they need to get back on their feet.
With the person in the street, people can be deployed to deescalate the situation and figure out if that person may have any mental disorders like schizophrenia, ptsd, severe autism, alzheimer's, or if they're just high or drunk, and the list goes on.
With the woman with her child, she may suffer from postpartum depression, she may be having a panic attack, or just be sleep deprived, and this task force would get her the help she needs to be able to better take care of her baby and have this not happen again.
And these are just a FEW scenarios that come to mind I have PERSONALLY seen people get beaten to the ground over/shoved into the backs of cars by police for.
In
very few situations does anyone mean Disband The Police when they say Defund The Police. Please stop thinking that.