There is no offline scene for MK2, therefore, results are based on our online performance. Nobody is going to spend $500 to go play a 10 man MK2 tournament. The whole argument that offline results are all that matters is not legitimate in MK2. Someone said in another thread that if you have success online then your success will most likely be greater offline. Weren't you the one that siad that?
There's been offline tournaments. My point is you can be the best player in the world, but until you prove it offline, it doesn't really matter. REO has proven he's good, you may not agree, but he's proven himself at a tournament, more than once. Until you do the same, the point is moot. Not trying to be a dick, that's just how it is.
For the record, I'm not saying you're not better than him. I've played both of you and you are better. But you can't claim the best through online, even if there's no offline scene. This is a lesson I've learned from UMK3. Many many people label Shock and Joe 2 of the best UMK3 players. As much as I hate that and don't agree as far as Joe is concerned, I can't say much. Even though I beat both of them 2-0 in tournament, they have won many UMK3 tournaments, more than anyone in the US I believe.
I think online players are great, I'm an online player myself. My point is not that you are not good because you play online, my point is that it doesn't matter if you're good if you ONLY play online. See what I mean?