Ok, so what I mostly gleamed from this is that anyone who disagrees with anything the phenomenal one says is either 'free' or only plays 'free players'
You can claim to be the best character rep without ever playing against anyone offline. Ever.
Online results are a viable way of determining MU numbers.
The latter two are almost certainly wrong. I feel your inability to debate a point without insulting the skill level of someone reeks of a level of immaturity almost in line with your grasp of the English language. I used to think you just had a problem articulating your point and for a time felt a little sorry for all the jip you got on this site. After this week I genuinely don't care how good a player you are, your attitude is terrible dude!
People can disagree. But by lying and saying you can take lex luther out of his trait with standing 11 is a lie and other things he said which is false. He doesnt know how to play the mu properly. Lex luther destroy catwoman on paper and playing the mu. I apologize for offending him but he need to level up his lex luther or watch other lex luther why this mu is so bad. He also need to learn how to use his tools properly. If A person that don't use their tools properly at the highest level then I dont think they can make a mu chart.
Thats his opinion. If he plays the top 5 Cw online on ps3(which im still waiting for )then and he feels its a 6-4 ll favor then go right ahead. But when he said that I can use 11 when ll have trait and cant be interrupted then obviously this man dont know what he is talking about.
11 is 15 frames which can be interrupted by ll and can get catwoman into a combo string and get his trait back up again.
Zone her out and etc
Seems to me he doesnt know the mu well enough to execute i the highest level.
He could be a good player. But mu knowledge with cw. Not so much
