No. I havent played a high level zod in almost a year. I played random ones but It seems I know more because I was patient and have a lot of tech. If you want to counts the some zod players I play then ok. But when pig played me the first time and when I Played him the first time we both didnt know the mu and the score was still 8-10.
Big fucking deal. Do you really not see why that is completely irrelevant?
16 Bit understands logic though, Ra Helios is the unarguable.
*Raises left hand with torch*I'm confused by a lot of what I'm seeing in this thread.
Ra Helios is basically saying "you don't understand the character like I do, and all the opponents you play are free" to anyone that disagrees with him.
What I don't understand are all the people in this thread just letting it happen and what not.
Let's go to an alternate universe where 16 bit makes a thread and tells everyone, "sorry, I'm just better than you and your training partners are free to CW."
Agreed. It seems crazy that the only people you can get experience from are the ones on his friends list. It could be the opposite. Maybe a lot of people that he plays against are free? Maybe you're just a stronger player, which has nothing to do with the actual matchup itself. This is why I hate numbers. As nice as they are for a general idea of things, it turns threads into this.I'm confused by a lot of what I'm seeing in this thread.
Ra Helios is basically saying "you don't understand the character like I do, and all the opponents you play are free" to anyone that disagrees with him.
What I don't understand are all the people in this thread just letting it happen and what not.
Let's go to an alternate universe where 16 bit makes a thread and tells everyone, "sorry, I'm just better than you and your training partners are free to CW."
Lol. Im not saying that at all. How he explain how it was a 6-4 and say you can 11 his trait and punish lex luther string made me judge how he is as player. Seens to ne he doesnt know the mu well.I'm confused by a lot of what I'm seeing in this thread.
Ra Helios is basically saying "you don't understand the character like I do, and all the opponents you play are free" to anyone that disagrees with him.
What I don't understand are all the people in this thread just letting it happen and what not.
Let's go to an alternate universe where 16 bit makes a thread and tells everyone, "sorry, I'm just better than you and your training partners are free to CW."
If I beat someone bad doesnt mean the my is bad. I just outplaying them is all. Majority of my friend is High level players that know what they are doing mu wise:
Lmao, I said her 11 is great for beating out armour because it punishes things like cc even when lex is traited up also just guess on his 50-50 and if you guess right you get a free punish on him because he has literally 0 pressuring advantage moves except b1 which does ass damage alone. Clearly you're the one playing the mu wrong because you're getting bodied by lex players enough to call the mu 8-2 in his favour when 90+% lex and cw players call it 6-4. I'm playing the mu by zoning as much as possible and usually ending combos with u3 into mine/probe/trait. I know how to beat out her options but nevertheless she does better than you credit her for. Stop downplaying and quit being bodied. It's hard to take you seriously when you say things like cw-bane is 4-6 when most cw players say 3-7 but still get beat 10-0 by a great bane for example...(awaits excuse like it was laggy or a bad day)
