I'm going to attempt to get this thread off the D'vorah train. I think the D'vorah up- and downplaying should stay in the D'vorah forums.
So when it comes to the nerfing EX-flip by removing armor thing as a catalyst for 'should defensive options be nerfed' question, I think it's justified. Just because armor is a defensive option doesn't give it a free pass just because it's a defensive option. EX-flip has excellent synergy with so many of Alien's options and that EX-flip already has so much going for it. Turning F134 into a launching 50/50, the fact that it can be mixed with the low-hitting Snag, how it can be used as an aerial armored launcher, how its hitbox is huge, how it crushes lows... I think removing armor on it is a good way to nerf the move, one because it makes the EX-flip metagame less insane than it currently is, and because as mentioned in the Podcast, Alien already has enough armor as is.
@General M2Dave there's something you said in the podcast I have to touch on. (22:17) "People who say that Tremor sucks or that he's low tier now, you guys are complete fools haha. The EX-low shatter is probably still like a top 3 move in the game. Again, this is just a fact." After P2W interrupted you for a bit: "Haha of course, I'm not a downplayer; when something is good I'm gonna say that it's good."
While I appreciate that you've become much more reasonable lately Dave, I'm sure others will remember your past outings (P2W certainly seemed to lol). The famous 'Quan is mid tier' stuff, the 'Is Tremor abysmal?' thread and while I missed it in Injustice, please correct me if I'm wrong, you also thought Zod was quire bad when he came out. Again I appreciate the reason that you've been talking lately, but with all the past things you've said I find it hard to take you seriously on matters like these. It's very hypocritical to first go 'Tremor is extremely terrible' and go 'Tremor is really good' next. Hell, even in the Tremor forums in general you often talked about how Tremor was bad and whatnot.
If you've acknowledged that you were wrong in the past then it's fine, but to me you're voicing two opinions that are extremely far from one another and calling out downplayers while you yourself have played down quite a bit.