If all you were attempting to do was correct me, and inform me there are more "optimal" combos, there were far less confrontational and arrogant ways of going about it (whether or not you meant it that way). Not to mention your argument regarding optimal combos is flawed to shit; you told me there is no reason to use meter in any escrima midscreen combos because you said it's not worth the "slight increase in damage". So what's the point of doing this staff combo: 1f1xxdb2 MB b3 j2 3 1xxbf3 (39%), when you can easily do this for no meter: 2, b3, j2, 3, 1 xx bf3 = 36%? Yet both are in the OP (no offense to the TC). My combos, with and without meter also had a 3% discrepancy. You also mentioned that there were more damaging meterless escrima combos than what I had posted, so why aren't they in OP?
Just because a combo doesn't do as much damage as another combo (especially when they have a 1-3% damage difference), doesn't mean that that particular combo should be disregarded. By that same logic, this combo 1f1xxdb2 MB b3 j2 3 1xxbf3 (39%) shouldn't be in the OP. Hell, there are some BnB threads that include every variation of a combo, percentiles be damned. I'm not saying my combos are groundbreaking, or deserve to be in OP, but they aren't the "worthless post" you make them out to be. That's your opinion, and I disagree with it, so who're you to say otherwise, as if you have the authority to?
At the least, you could have gone about this far more tactful and less confrontational. Parading around a forum with a chip on your shoulder waiting to make an issue out of literally nothing but a single post, is a good way of showing how socially inept you are.
im out yo gotta get my sleep on, work with < 4 hours is ass