PND i2 Gaug3
NERF Everything, LEAVE Nothing
love your thought process slips.High risk/unlimited reward is the
This message is brought to you by The Hateocracy
love your thought process slips.High risk/unlimited reward is the
I'm trying to impress on you the difference between 'sharing information' and telling top players they are definitively wrong with no solid real-world proof to back it up. 2 completely diff. things.As i said before. I understand that it can be frustrating. Hwever, we cannot close off the ability to share information from any player. That breeds ignorance. Yor setting up scenarios where player a cannot be taken seriously until they win a tournament...unless of course they are in with the pros.
but one thing id like to point out is Im on record of when i said standing 2 wasnt a good AA w kenshi that i was really wrong. My gripes are more about my example in few posts above in the player A + B scenarios.Dude, if i tell pig he is wrong on kenshi tech, and he is going out amd placing top 8 with him, why would he get upset? He would be taking it personally. Thats what i said above. There is no need for that kind of bickering. Most of those cases could be solved with a simple "cool dude, thanks for the input". Instead it turns into 5 pages of bickering. Sorry for the spelling. I am typing on a tablet.
TakeAChance on tapatalk
Claude is having issues accessing his account right now so he asked me to post this for him:16 Bit-This is where it gets twisted. So now it’s “he got exposed for trying to rig brackets”? He didn’t even try, the video “evidence” that we got is that he was strongly considering an offer dangled to him by a guy claiming he would rig brackets. He says he’s sorry, all contrite, and when he comes back he sees that the guy who SAID HE WAS GOING TO DO IT can openly joke about bracket rigging, where people still call him a piece of shit for putting the single modicum of thought in his head. Also ignored was Revolver’s talking point that STH was and has been rigging brackets for a while. How could you not be upset with the community for that enormous double standard?
Another message from Clawed:It's real simple, son: the point was not that you did it and it's ridiculous that 16 Bit was blamed, the point was that NOTHING happened, neither of you did anything of merit to the brackets, BUT 16 Bit will continue catching shit for it where as when you joke about it it's fine. The joking about it is fine, that's not what I was pointing out. What I was pointing out was that the double standard is there that if 16 Bit still gets heat whereas you don't, when you're both in the same position. It's silly.
And I can 100% agree with you on that last bit. There are people who are like that in this very community who are driving people out, and it sucks. I would love for everyone to stick around but I also realize that the issue is that things, especially like the whole NEC thing, where hammed up by the people who would rather have their GOTCHA moment then competing.Another message from Clawed:
I can't control what people think of 16 bit , myself, or anyone else for that matter. I think the whole thing is ridiculous and because of the way it was presented 16 bit is being crucified for it and myself. I got a LOT of shit for it, people demanding I be banned, etc. Also there are other adverse affects which I won't go into here but the point is there are members of this community who want NOTHING more than to see people brought down. I can understand why people like CD jr, pig or whoever it is.. don't want to be a part of this online community anymore.
I completely agree with this.Once again, we should be modeling the type of behavior that promotes collaboration. That way, top players can be scene as guides, and the base group of casuals would feel comfortable contributing as much tech and knowledge as they could.
Hugs are for Capcom players.So has everyone aired their stuff? Can we all hug it out now?
Juggs when did you start being right?One thing about an established player sharing information is that you have to accept that there will be those type of players who will disagree with you. I think that would be something that would be easy to accept. And I think most of the established players do accept it. But, usually, the people who disagree do it in such a disrespectful manner and without evidence/experience that it discourages said established player from contributing. At the same time though, the same established players, even though they are well experienced and know a lot about the match-up, need to lower that wall of ego and allow someone to disagree with you without getting emotional about it.
The people who disagree with you in a constructive and respectful manner and provide evidence to back their statements, you shouldn't be upset with this and should want to engage in a healthy discussion. The people who disagree and are disrespectful, such as "you're wrong bro, level up", just ignore them and report the post. There's no need to respond to that kind of negativity even if it's coming from another well established player. It doesn't matter who is being disrespectful, treat them all the same.
Pig Of The Hut