I did not say that SF4 was completely balanced. I said that it was way more balanced than mk11, which is not a difficult task by any means.
I played sf4 alot....you just could not win against a guy that was better than you at neutral and reactions....it was almost impossible, but in mk11....with all the incentives for kids to not abandon the game....look at dragons video man....
I think what you guys are saying to justify your positions is just not a criteria that should be used in order to evaluate if a game is balanced, fair.
1 - "Mkx was worse"....nice. So MK11 is good because is better than MKX. So....bad food in restaurant 2 is actually good because bad food in restaurant 1 was worse. What about look at the game....again...dragon summed that up to you guys...just watch that.
2 - A ton of characters in top 16....right: Just buff all the characters on the cast and give all of them bullshit. This is gonna lead to people think that the game is balanced. This centainly is gonna disguise the bullshit.
If the majority of the cast relly on bullshit to win....is this a fair game? I think NRS tactic is working...people really think that the game is fair because it has more characters in top 8 than previous games....but what they did was just put bullshit in everyone....is this balance?
Of course the game is what it is....people don't have a clue about anything....press buttons and be happy with jaccqui.
Look at how many times xinok just pressed shit....just did it....and konqueror lost! Konqueror is one the best players in mk11 at neutral in my opinion....
But hey....the game is balanced because mkx was worse and all the chars have bs so I can use my bs against another bs.