im cool with this but the EVO judges would have to throw a hardline to this. if that character is broken there should totally be ban, even if its last minute and pisses some people off. just like Kabal infinites fudged up regular tournaments till recently, this time NOBODY should be given a chance. if its Broken and aint fixed, then its BROKEN and shouldnt be allowed. ive already voted no, but im ok with her being there if theres no infinites or anything thats abnormally strong.Before blindly voting, I urge everyone to consider the following:
1. The character is 1 day old. We will learn more about her in the following weeks
2. We are STILL learning things about characters from day 1(April 19th) that had to be patched out in the day before CEO(another major tournament)... it must be considered that this is also a possibility with Skarlet as well.
3. As the character strats develop, she could turn out to be overpowered, broken, or crap tier.
4. If you choose not to purchase her, you can still play against her as the "compatibility patch" makes her available to play against online. This may not help to a great extent, but it will at least give ALL players a fair chance to develop a sense of what the matchup is like even if they have chosen not to purchase her.
5. We have ZERO tournament experience with her. It will be difficult to determine where she stands as a character without that data.
On a personal note, I just don't think that 1 month is enough time for the fighting game community to fully explore her and all her options and exploit everything she can do. We only learned a few weeks ago about the Kung Lao tele-infinite, and just 2 weeks ago ALL Cyrax players had to completely adjust their entire game, if not drop him completely for an alternate. The point here is, Skarlet needs to be fully tested by the community first. We need people to try to break her, we need tournament data on her and how people perform with her, etc.
I can't vote in this because the right answer doesn't exist for me, but for me the answer is:
Lets get some data on her in the next few weeks and see where she stands. Tentatively do not ban her, but could be a last minute ban if something is found that makes her broken/unplayable.
I like this idea, but the folks at EVO need to make it very clear from now until then that there could potentially be a ban. This way, people can specialize in an alternate, and not be SOL when/if the ban happens.....Tentatively do not ban her, but could be a last minute ban if something is found that makes her broken/unplayable.
The problem here is that if NRS makes changes the day before EVO, like they did with CEO, then you're talking about taking an entire month's work that people will have put into Skarlet and basically changing it. It could be a damage reduction, a buff that makes her OP'd, or changing something that changes her entire strategy like they did with Cyrax. These players will have to go back to their "old" main which they prob. have not played or practiced much with since Skarlet's release and therefore will be very rusty with them.No she shouldnt be banned at Evo. like many have said, there is one month before evo and there can be changes implemented.
NRS needs to get somebofbthebbig players in to test the character and.find the broken stuff, might make things easier.
alternatively, learn another character to beat Skarlett. She is in the game, deal with it. If Skarlett is banned, then Yun should be banned as well as XFactor.
I didn't know Yun and X-Factor are in MK9 now, did that come in the patch?If Skarlett is banned, then Yun should be banned as well as XFactor.
Good call.I have informed NRS that the cutoff for changes for Evo is July 6th. At that time, the EVO PS3's will be loaded with the current changes, and then taken offline until Evo is over.
That way people have a chance to practice with the current changes to make a strong showing at Evo.
Dan, what if a player like Perfect Legend from Ohio, or Floe from California were to travel the HUNDREDS of miles to play at ECT, only to lose to a character they have little matchup experience against, could potentially be broken and is virtually untested? How do you explain that to them? If, in the next 3 days, Skarlet turns out to be super broken or super God tier, how do you tell people, "well she's in the game, virtually untested, you just spent $500+ to come out here to play, and you lost to an untested, broken character that you have no experience against... oh well...too bad."wait a min. I still don't understand why she's banned at ECT. tons of characters got changes and changes the way we play vs them.
cage, nw, sheeva, jax, quan chi, liu kang. xbox just got the update so these players have to adjust to the changes. we going to ban these characters too?
me as a sindel player has to totally change the way I play those characters. it's a new learning process. it's stupid to even think about banning a DLC character ever. as long as they are on both consoles.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Very good thinking Wiz. Great way of handling this.I have informed NRS that the cutoff for changes for Evo is July 6th. At that time, the EVO PS3's will be loaded with the current changes, and then taken offline until Evo is over.
That way people have a chance to practice with the current changes to make a strong showing at Evo.
Tay, that means that you're requiring every tournament player to purchase her in order to learn her if they wanna learn every nuance.Shouldn't be banned. If players wanna win, they're gonna study up on every character that is in the game.
thats what i was thinking. shes not unlocked freely.purchase her in order to learn her if they wanna learn every nuance.
Buying her isnt the issue. Learning her/learning to play against her is the issue.Tay, that means that you're requiring every tournament player to purchase her in order to learn her if they wanna learn every nuance.