DarksydeDash
You know me as RisingShieldBro online.
Please explain then, because I am absolutely sure Street Fighter is dominated with strong footsies and vortexes.
Please explain then, because I am absolutely sure Street Fighter is dominated with strong footsies and vortexes.
Savage!
have you played street fighter?
More then MK. But that has nothing to do with it
Actually Sonic doesn't. He has. inj, MKX, MKX,
Yeah, my bad. When watching live, someone said "SonicFox is now the only American, he's our only hope", so I figured those other two were from Canadia or something.
Yeah I knew MK9 was just a side tournament for that year, I thought he did for DOA and skullgirls though
I know he won Skullgirls. I think he won DOA. But idk about medals. He still got the wins/Top 8's. But i think Ed has more medals than sonicfox. Doesn't really matter when you have 250K+ from playing video games though. LBSH
I rather play a good game than a shit game just cause it will stay alive a bit longer lol.
First of that first comment is just not true. More tournament players does not equal higher ceiling. if you have 100 more trash players the ceiling stays the same. also the thing about the list of skills you mentioned is those are things you have in both games just with different ratios and lastly saying "a game having 40% 50/50's is a bad thing" on it's own is extremely close minded. The only concept that universally can be applied to any fighting game to say it's good or bad is balance and character variety. Almost everything else and definitely everything you mentioned is the same as saying "i want to play your game how i play this game not the way you intended it and since i can't your game must be bad"
It stays longer for a reason. Calling sfv shit when it's by far the most respected and competitive famous fighter ever kinda sounds like sour grapes. I think we should if anything embrace capcoms idealogy of its releases. If nrs did the same then I think more people would respect their games for what they are, truly awesome games themselves. I'm talking about the franchise, if you mean only sfv then you're entitled to your opinion.
Yea, if you put your time on any game you'll get better, it's simple logic. There are games where maybe the gameplay is easier to pick up, but you're not going to beat everyone in mkx then expect to do the same in sf, and vice versa.
Exactly. I think we'll always have the stigma od being "scruby" by some Capcom players , its just pure bias. I'm afraid we'll never get rid of it no matter how good we get on our or their games.
Never something more wiser was said. Its funny how this: more players = higher level thing is getting people to support SF. Like, I really - really - began following the FGC through SFIV, and after a year of CPT - which was the 2015's CPT - and alot of researching to find the 'best sets' in the game's history I never found anything close to UMVC3's top 8 at EVO in 2014, or even - in recent memory - KI's World Cup in March of this year, so I stopped following Street Fighter's scene, because it wasn't as cool to watch than the gods of the other games. And even with less numbers some games can have a higher level because sometimes the chance of the better players getting scrubbed out before even getting to a top 32 is lower than a game with more entrants and more chances of a random upset - since comeback mechanics are as strong as ever. And I don't call a top player losing by wake-up jabs - or ultra punishes that took half your life - a higher competitiveness, I just call it randomness.
At least NRS has got their online mess cleaned up. If anything, SFV's is worse now than it was a year ago.
Many SF players were unhappy with SFIV, but they were loyal to it. Why? Because it was all they had for years with no promise of another SF game. Now many, many SF players are unhappy with SFV, but they are going to play it forever. Why, you ask? Because it is the new SF. How many copies of SFV were sold in it's first 18 months? An embarrassing amount. That's what legacy gets you.
SFV is the worst fighter i have ever play, i don't give a shit about respect, if game is garbage I won't play it period.
Sf isn't as much a casual game as mk, that's undeniable. You know I've refrained from attacking either game because I like both the same. But it's laughable that some people try ti shit on sf when deep down they wished their game of choice was as iconic as sf. It would suck to hate sf and yet everywhere I turned, testyourmight included, sf dominated. What's embarrassing is having to take hits at sf when deep down other games aren't even taken seriously.
I MEAN GATDAMNIT SONICFOX YOU SAVAGEMy favourite part of it:
The "Street Fighter" brand has respect, much of it earned. That being said, SFV is a poorly-made fighting game. Any true fighting game fan and SF fan in particular will agree if they are being honest.
More famous? In which universe lol. Seriously you can tag on SF all you want it's still got100x more global recognition than the games you listed.
