I think Wound's vague retorts to the multitude of extremely specific MU related statements made by king, rude, MIT, and co demonstrate that he really doesn't know what he's talking about. Sure, making statements like "BM players need to backdash b13 more" and "BM players should play more lame/outzone GL" (why not if he can outzone sinestro too?
) feed the illusion that he is knowledgable; but when the aforementioned people make mention of specific MU dynamics such as:
- BM can't punish a backdashed b13 (he doesn't even get free pressure because his normals don't have enough range) unless he has trait or has his back to the corner (how is BM going to get in on GL without using trait when GL has a b1/a solid d2/all those zoning options?)
- b1 can go underneath trait bats
- GL's zoning options deal more damage (mb or non-mb) and cover twice as much distance in half the time
- Even with trait, BM has a hard time punishing a zone-happy GL
- BM is at the mercy of GL's diverse oki options
- Because of GL's great walk speed, it's hard to consistently play right outside his b1 range in hopes of whiff-punishing (which can only be done with trait as well)
And his response is "gross bodied you at mlg," "GL's footsie options get punished hard," or simply ignore some of these points altogether, someone has to call bullshit.
Wound, you're the homie and all, but if you're gonna make these wild claims, back them up with quantifiable examples instead of trying to convince everyone that BM players are just that amateur...it makes sense now though, if you're able to convince enough people that BM is this unstoppable, impenetrable force, it allows you to downplay sinestro that much more and feed the narrative that you're just that much of a godsend to whichever "shitter" of a character you main.
You guys, I see the light full-circle now!