Here's a point I thought of, as far as disregarding the BLM movement simply because of their founder being a Marxist. It's a bit of a broad point, but I think it's a fair one to make, so maybe I can get an opinion or two on it.
If America was founded by a handful of coked up, slave-owning, Indian-killing white men (which it was), do you base all of your judgements on everyone who's lived in or prospered in America since its' inception from the people who started it?
Would you disregard the importance or merits of those people, their lives, or their beliefs, or what the country itself represents, or the opportunity it provides that is not afford anywhere else, because of how America was founded?
Probably not, right?
So why is it okay for anyone to do that with BLM?
Just curious.