It's a burning cigarette. Cigarettes are also referred to as cancer sticks. He basically can be seen as saying that he is a cancer.
Or a square. In the euroland, they're known as [ban incoming]. At least i think it's a European term lol.
Wow.
wtf is wrong with you? you have this big hate fest for me, one of your fav things to do on tym is bash me as much as possible. seriously dude, maybe its time to let it go. funny thing is, I didnt even do anything wrong to you, you just think that I intentionally ignored you on a hectic weekend. I even apologized for it and tried to explain it. I even said that next event you go to that I'd refuse to shake anyones hand until I saw you first lol. come on man, time to move on.
The guy attacks just about anybody that's not a top player he can kiss the ass of. (Edit: Not to say that you are not a top player, Tom. But, he goes deepthroat for some.) It's what he does. It's his hobby because obviously playing the game no longer cuts it for him.
LOL.. I'm sure the dude got mad in 16bits recent top 10 thread about me because about 70% of the replies had me top 10 and the other 30% had me at # 11. he gets angry at any mention of me being considered a great player.
It doesn't take my level of people training to know who's a real insecure stuck up bastard (no example) and who's simply the kind of person to focus so hard he misses some details (you).
its not on par because I missed 5 majors while commentating MLG. BTW... those majors are the MAIN factor in who the top resumes in 2012 are. Also, keep in mind that some of the players you would put top 10 havent placed in a major tourney in over 6 months. There are some players who's only 2012 accomplishments are doing well in 2 MLG events and failing to place in any other event especially in the last 6 months. Yet, me not competing in any major for 6 months then CURRENTLY placing the fist chance I get is held against me, when the reason I failed to place in so long is because I couldnt play and not because I didnt deliver.
You forgot about EVO. Where you didn't even make top 16.
neither did REO.. Know the MAIN reason why he is considered #1 in 2012 resume wise? 2 MLG wins and a win at NEC. Take out those 2 MLG wins and he would not be considered #1 for 2012. Denzell didnt place top 16 at EVO, but he is considered top because of his performances at MLG and rightfully so.
NEC was def a top major. Just because a few key players were not there does not take away from the ridiculous amount of other top players that were there. I agree that it was missing some key guys (IMO the ones you mentioned plus Dizzy and X blades) but it was still stacked with top level talent and had well over 100 players who came from all over the country (Texas, Florida, NY, California, Chicago, etc). I dont think its fair to take away from Tom's top 8 finish at NEC by trying to say it was not a top major. I think 90% of the community would consider NEC a top major.
did you even read my post of the players who didnt go? i edited it right before you replied. homie you cant be serious saying nec is a major comparable to ones like evo. nec was far from stacked as evo was
I agree with you that the players you named are absolutely key players and not having them there does matter but it was still a top major in my opinion. It is hard to get everyone at every major but NEC had a good portion of the top players which would make it a top major. Evo would probably be the only grassroots tournament that had more of the top guys and obviously all of the top guys are going to make the trip for the MLG events due to the prize money. If NEC is not a top major then nothing outside of EVO/MLG should be considered a top major would basically be what you are saying. (and if that is what you are saying fair enough, but i disagree). Im not trying to start an argument over this, I just feel that if you made a poll of the community and asked "would you consider NEC 13 a top major" the vast majority would say yes despite the players who you listed that did not attend.
give me the top 3 most stacked majors for 2012 and reasons why. i dont care for no poll in which timmy down the block can post his 2 cents in. im telling you nec will not be in the top 3
So basically if it is not in the top 3 (which would obviously be the MLG events and Evo) therefore it is not a top major? NEC also had a way better turnout than several of the MLG events, and there were key players missing from many of the MLG events as well so you could make an argument the other direction as well. I dont know what is up your ass but all I am saying is that most of the community considers NEC to be a top major. Im done derailing this thread with this stupid argument. If you dont think NEC was a top major thats fine, but you cant state it as fact because the fact is that it had a better turnout than the majority of the MLG events and had top players from all over the country.
OK I want ask for a real answer here. Are you making the argument that Tom Brady may be a top player but we don't know it because of both missing all MLG events and only placing top at smaller tournaments? Or are you making the argument that Tom Brady is NOT a top player at all? Or are you just busting his balls to be a pain in the ass?
youre only argument is nec had a lot of numbers so its top major. look no one cares if nec got 200 players when the most of the key top 20 players were absent and not present. why can you not understand that? its not about numbers its about the amount of top players that showed. stop saying numbers and entries. no one wants to see 50 stream matches of john vs jim. they want to see hype fights like detroit vs dizzy
9 of the top 20 NFG ranked players were there. That is basically half of the top 20 best players at 1 grassroots major which to me would mean that it is a top major. And honestly, do you not think the level of competition was good? There were a ton of players at NEC that are very skilled that are not even on the NFG top 20 and I am sure that many of the top 20 players themselves would agree with me.
