More like I'm focused on the subject at hand while you are more concerned with saving face when you are wrong for the second time about the same subject. I said b.23 and f.23 cover the same distance, which on a practical standpoint they do. I never said they were equal in all respects, but if you need to re-read the small print you are welcome to review my previous posts explaining the usages of b.23 and b.2 in general.
I don't bother to up-play since most people are mislead about details anyways, meaning I could be telling the exact truth and people wouldn't know. I'm informing about a particular scenario, to which your choice to agree or not is unimportant and optional. If you feel like you have to for whatever reason, it won't make you less wrong simply because you try to straw-man your way out of it. However, since the first patch I've yet to be wrong about a good collection of things people have chosen to deny without a second thought, so its not like you being wrong is anything new. If you think b.23 and f.23 aren't similar in range (which you've claimed before and have been proven wrong a multitude of times before resorting to your current state where you attempt to attack an argument I'm not making), then by all means provide proof to the point. If you have quarrels with any other aspect of the move, then take it to someone who cares.