It's misinformation because it can be looked at as circumstantial because the doctor has literally nothing to prove anything. What if it was something else that wasn't vitamin C? What would you say then?
I understand that it's easy to attach to any form of hope that's thrown out there, especially when you see something familiar like "vitamin C" coupled with "helps treat Coronavirus", but you have got to think for yourself and really look at things from a different perspective.
Just because someone is a doctor doesn't mean they're incapable of being wrong. They're still human, can jump the gun, make incorrect statements while citing them as facts, etc and still be wrong.
You seem all too willing to just suck up whatever gets shoveled your way. Why isn't your default train of thought the following: "How can this doctor claim it helps when years of research still cannot prove that vitamin C helps with the common cold? What are his credentials to make this claim? Where's his research?" and so on.
To answer your other question: I wouldn't take a fucking thing from God himself if he couldn't show me factual data that it does this and causes that. Simple as that. Too much of a risk in trying something that hasn't been proven to work. No, this isn't in the sense that I'm being offered vitamin C. I know that vitamin C isn't gonna hurt me unless there's something wrong with me and my body's response to it. I'm specifically saying I wouldn't try something that could kill me instead of help me because there's not enough data to determine which is likely to happen.
From God himself?
![Stick Out Tongue :p :p](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/tongue.png)
Even if he could snap and make you fine? lol not a religious guy I take, I would if it was freaking God lol but anyway ok. So that's a no then. So even if you were dying and your doc said, this COULD help you or you will die, you'd be like "well I'm skeptical let me die" instead? I mean by this point what do you have to lose? lol you're dying anyway but I do find your answer interesting. Keep in mind I'm talking like on your deathbed not just sick.
I don't believe it's misinformation, I'm just posting it because you had asked and it gives me hope that we have things to battle this thing(not cure it, yet at least if we can) it's merely an article about a doctor who's patients are doing better with VC(in higher doses) than not. I'm not believing some chump "expert" from out of country over my own doctor man, I don't care what I have if I'm ill. lol I'm not saying he's perfect, or always right but the downplay of things on here of things that clearly help patients is kind of insane. They also jacked up the does of Vitamin C which is far more than a regular dose. If I were to be skeptical, I'd get a second opinion. I was born with a heart defect and still have it but keep an eye on it. First guy(a science professor and teenage and adult cardiologist) told me I needed emergency surgery to him, This guy was all "oh get it fixed now or could harm you in your 20's!!"my family and I weren't satisfied so we got a second opinion from another doctor who had a better rep in the city. I wasn't having any health issues mind you. So anyway we saw another guy in the city as I've said. He said the opposite, said in my older age it COULD potentially cause me issues but I could also live to 95 no problem with it so long as it heals/almost closes. He said we COULD close it if we want but it's not necessary, and as most know surgery is always risky unless necessary. So I got an eco every year to keep an eye and we found it was closing, just healing slower than some other people. However still there, it's not harmful level. I was 12 when it was first found so we're not fully grown yet.
I listened to his recommendation of (at the time) my cardiologist for kids and teens (top 100 cardiologists in the state at the time before he retired) he said the same thing, said the first guy overreacted and was probably high and mighty thinking he was 'an expert" on the matter. The guy was a basic cardiologist, this guy was in top 100 in the state so yeah....
I still have it today and it's caused me no issues, so who was right? Not the so called expert at first glance. Some scientists and doctors bs people too you know, going from my own personal experience, I'd gladly believe my own doc any day over a scientist when it comes to my health. Others can disagree, that's fine but I'm going based off my own personal experience as well here. If I got CV, it would be no different. But anyway dude, I have no issue respectfully disagreeing on some things. You're reasonable, I'm reasonable. It's all good. I just want you to know why I feel that way using my own example, first dude nearly scared my folks to death til I talked to my mom about getting a different opinion. Something told me not to buy the first guys bs, and my instinct turned out to be right.