Ok, I have been NOTHING but respectful. I have asked politely what people who have some idea how to play this game think he needs. I haven't said what exactly I thought he needed because I stated I didn't know him well enough to know how to 'fix' him EXCEPT, stating that he needed several of the FIXES you proposed. So, excellent work being a complete jack-ass and not realizing I was agreeing with several things you had said, but disagreed with a statement someone else had made about damage (That I, again, politely stated, and then clarified in a separate post). I wasn't aware we weren't allowed to disagree with you, or ask questions (pertaining to the topic) etc? You made a point, I made a counter-point. Uh oh! Better get childish and insulting and bitch like a 5yr old!
And the Ermac thing? Since you have proven to be too stupid to follow your own logic (that's pretty impressive btw). You said he was just the first name you lit on, so you used him to illustrate a point.. I simply used him to illustrate a counter-point. I used him in exactly the same way you did. Maybe you cant read that well through the visor of your helmet or maybe you just don't read well to begin with but if you ask your handler nicely they might help you sound out the stuff that's giving you trouble. Or, maybe I just made the mistake of trying to have an intelligent and polite discussion with an jackass?
I'm gonna go ahead and guess now, that you are one of the legions of mouth-breathing idiots that think a discussion is everyone agreeing to exactly what you say, or saying nothing, or perhaps in some fashion building on your current ideas (Fuck it, lets make *everything* Sub has totally safe and make it so he poops out little mini-clones every so many seconds like the worlds coldest hamster). Unfortunately cupcake, the world, and most certainly a DISCUSSION FORUM, don't work that way.
How about we spend a moment with that word..
Discussion.
"an act or instance of
discussing; consideration or examination by argument, comment, etc., especially to explore solutions; informal debate."
I thought it might be relevant to post its actual meaning here since you don't seem to be terribly familiar with it. I have been DISCUSSING the proposed changes since my first post. Simply asking what OTHER people thought he needed and stating my opinions. Ya know homie? If a handful of reputable players come in and say you are right, then BOOM, I'll gladly smile and say cool, that's what SZ needs. The stuff I disagreed with, I musta been wrong about. But I don't see that happening. Other than a few people agreeing with the FIXES he needs (Again, I agreed with you there. I keep reminding you of this because lord knows by now, if you don't have a nosebleed already from all these words, you are starting to forget what i said originally), I don't see a whole lot of support.. Also, just for the record, I think b33xBIGASSBALLOFICE shouldn't need to be meter-burned to connect on any one.
So really, given what I have said, I'm not real sure what the animosity is about? I responded to
@One Inch Punch, politely, because he asked me, politely, my opinion. Granted, he could have said it sarcastically, but I chose to take the high road and assume since I disagreed with him, he was asking my reasoning. And, I stated my support for some of your suggestions.
I'm not sure how to help you not be an asshole and an idiot, but I'll tell you this, if Sub *is* going to get any changes made to him, he's likely going to need a more competent spokesperson than you.
Ohh, one more thing. I don't play Sub, I play against him. If you don't understand the value and the need for non-sub mains to at least state their opinions, then - well, you've proven my point that you are not the guy to be asking for, or championing Sub changes.
Edited to tone it down some. Its 3am, I was a little more hateful than I should have been originally.