E
Eldriken
Guest
That's a good way to make someone disregard everything you said and just go straight into an effin' argument, dude. :|
That's a good way to make someone disregard everything you said and just go straight into an effin' argument, dude. :|
Not even a little. I've tested this several times with different people. It is incredibly hard to detect when a game is in motion. In my testing, proper resolution was only identified around 6 out of 10 times (therefore not even close to conclusive, in fact, quite the opposite). This was done on a 55" LED at a viewing distance of 8 feet (within THX recommended distance). I'm sure there are people out there that are more sensitive to it, thankfully, I'm not one of them.
Congratulations! You are in the minority of people who can tell the difference! Most people shouldn't care, but are being manipulated into thinking they should. Overall it isn't important in the grand scheme of things...which was/is my only point.
I know.
Just keep in mind that he may be responding to your previous message before reading this. So if you get a notification that he quoted you and flies off the handle, give him some time to catch up.
Totally off topic but how is Microsoft losing the exclusive game? Genuine curiosity of your perception not trying to come off rude in any way
lol yeah, I'm ready for the hate.Just keep in mind that he may be responding to your previous message before reading this. So if you get a notification that he quoted you and flies off the handle, give him some time to catch up.
But I respect the fact that you apologized, my friend! Most people would be like, "Fuck you." =P
This comment is just hypocrite if you don't own a PC, since the difference between 4K and 1080p is way more.
Preach that shit.
IT DOESN'T HAVE AS MANY REMASTERS AS WE DO.
4K monitors aren't expensive, hell you can even get some for $500.00. A PC that can run 4K games is indeed pricey, but in your own words, why would you settle for B?
Inexcusable? If your only ''concern'' is specs/resolution, sure. I don't even know what's there to brag about, most PS4 exclusives run at 30 fps anyways.
1080p 60 fps can be achieved by a mid range graphics card. The Witcher 3 on ultra, I can agree with that, most people won't be able to run it on ultra, but those who will definitely don't settle for B
I have a 780 ti, i don't need luck
People expect too much from a 400$ box.
If that turns out to be true, then i feel bad for everyone else, cause that would mean very poor programming...
If this is a PC gaming suggestion, no thanks. PC is an expensive, unreliable platform that requires constant attention. My PS4 is a simple creature that does what I ask and requests no maintenance.
I don't care about whatever 180p adds up to in visual stimulation. I'll never see it. I care about the fact that one $400 piece of equipment can't match the other, and hasn't for two years. As I said, this is not a reason for every XBone owner to throw out their systems and commit seppuku. But, it is the kind of thing thrifty customers (like me) consider when getting out their wallets. One system has MGS5 at 1080/60, the other doesn't. I'm not just going to GET OVER big games having qualifiable deficiencies.
Even ignoring the obvious numbers (www.listwar.com), I just don't see a lot on the MS only slate that makes it worth my money. Certainly, they have some good ones. Locking up Tomb Raider, for instance, is huge. But they still don't have the faith of the eastern developers which means a lot of genres are largely off the table. RPGs that aren't mass effect / skyrim and 3d action games that don't have guns are either coming to both or just the ps4. And while I don't necessarily think any of them are deal breakers yet (Arkham Knight and MKX are currently the only games I think are even worth buying next gen for and neither of them is exclusive) I think the investment for the future is better made on the Sony side for now.
