godlessmode
Apprentice
Based on that dudes logic this just in:
KABAL BOTTOM TIER DUE TO HARD TO USE
You are misunderstanding my point, and by the look of it are doing so on purpose.
People approach tier-lists in different ways, which is why tier-list discussions always go so "wonderfully". Many people argue that without tournament results all speculative positioning in a tier-list is "theory fighting".
However, understanding that a character has more potential but that potential has a steep, or challenging learning curve, or an execution barrier can help convey to both parties why a character should be top 5, but has yet to show strong tournament results.
Further, I find it very rude and dismissive of you to take that stance when you obviously didn't bother to understand my post whatsoever. Especially since I explicitly stated that...
"Zod is top 5 in theory"
If you would like to argue that he is top 5 in practice, you need to show evidence of that stance. Right now you have a theory that he is top 5 based on the attributes you listed (which is a strong theory) but in practice? How many majors has Zod won? How many significant locals?
MMH has placed better in less time. He is not only in theory strong. But has shown to be strong in practice as well. Right now, Zod is theory strong.
But maybe instead of providing constructive discussion I should take a dismissive, and rude approach like you have?