I'm not sure how that would settle anything. If Pig loses with Kenshi, then his argument is proven right. If Pig wins with Kenshi, it only proves that Pig played better, not that the character is above B tier. The second one is also weird because Pig winning the fight is close to a losing condition for his argument, so he'd have no incentive.
So I'm trying to think of how this could actually be proven.
Scenario (just for fun)
Yomi Tournament
If Pig were to pick up a new character, say Takeda, and go to Yomi- He could prove that Kenshi is low tier by playing only Takeda, while EVERYONE ELSE has to play Kenshi.
If Pig beats the entire Yomi roster when they use Kenshi while he uses someone that isn't even his main, that would be a huge blow up. (And entertaining as Hell. I'd love to see everyone try to play Kenshi for a local tourney while the challenger chose someone else).
For this to be possible, Pig would have to learn a new character though, so it's kind of on him to put on the show.
What do you guys think? It would be a very hype match, and I'm sure the stream would blow up!
@Pig Of The Hut @YOMI MITYEAP @YOMI Reno_Racks @YOMI MITYEAP