Menu
By:
Filters
What's new

The Greasiest Moment In NFL 2013 Happened Today

LionHeart V1

LionHeart V1

You will feel deaths cold embrace
AK Pig Of The Hut said:
Omg do you know anything about chad?

He does that shit for living to mock every system he is currently in
Click to expand...
Lol no i don't follow the guy around and read every head line he makes. I stand by my comment. Everything was done and over with. And i don't even like chad. It's sad to see how he's ended up, but if you are telling me that sending the guy to jail for giving his attorney a good job pat on his ass is worth 30 days in jail then wow. The audience in the court room has to realize that they are in a court of law as well. They should have been kicked out and punished too.
 
Pig Of The Hut

Pig Of The Hut

Day 0 Phenomenal Dr. Fate and Darkseid player
LionHeart V1 said:
Lol no i don't follow the guy around and read every head line he makes. I stand by my comment. Everything was done and over with. And i don't even like chad. It's sad to see how he's ended up, but if you are telling me that sending the guy to jail for giving his attorney a good job pat on his ass is worth 30 days in jail then wow. The audience in the court room has to realize that they are in a court of law as well. They should have been kicked out and punished too.
Click to expand...
Contempt of court is a court order which in the context of a court trial or hearing, declares a person or organization to have disobeyed or been disrespectful of the court's authority. Often referred to simply as "contempt," such as a person "held in contempt," it is the judge's strongest power to impose sanctions for acts which disrupt the court's normal process.
A finding of contempt of court may result from a failure to obey a lawful order of a court, showing disrespect for the judge, disruption of the proceedings through poor behaviour, or publication of material deemed likely to jeopardize a fair trial. A judge may impose sanctions such as a fine or jail for someone found guilty of contempt of court. Judges in common law systems usually have more extensive power to declare someone in contempt than judges in civil law systems. The client or person must be proven to be guilty before he/she will be punished.
In civil cases involving disputes between private citizens, the behaviour resulting in the ruling is often directed at one of the parties involved rather than at the court directly.
A person found in contempt of court is called a "contemnor." To prove contempt, the prosecutor or complainant must prove the four elements of contempt:
  • Existence of a lawful order
  • The potential contemnor's knowledge of the order
  • The potential contemnor's ability to comply
  • The potential contemnor's failure to comply
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_court
GGs
 
MorbidAltruism

MorbidAltruism

Get over here!
AK Pig Of The Hut said:
Contempt of court is a court order which in the context of a court trial or hearing, declares a person or organization to have disobeyed or been disrespectful of the court's authority. Often referred to simply as "contempt," such as a person "held in contempt," it is the judge's strongest power to impose sanctions for acts which disrupt the court's normal process.
A finding of contempt of court may result from a failure to obey a lawful order of a court, showing disrespect for the judge, disruption of the proceedings through poor behaviour, or publication of material deemed likely to jeopardize a fair trial. A judge may impose sanctions such as a fine or jail for someone found guilty of contempt of court. Judges in common law systems usually have more extensive power to declare someone in contempt than judges in civil law systems. The client or person must be proven to be guilty before he/she will be punished.
In civil cases involving disputes between private citizens, the behaviour resulting in the ruling is often directed at one of the parties involved rather than at the court directly.
A person found in contempt of court is called a "contemnor." To prove contempt, the prosecutor or complainant must prove the four elements of contempt:
  • Existence of a lawful order
  • The potential contemnor's knowledge of the order
  • The potential contemnor's ability to comply
  • The potential contemnor's failure to comply
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_court
GGs
Click to expand...
It is just Wikipedia... they don't believe that shit. SMH. :p
 
I

its_ezie

Apprentice
this lady has lost her mind. smh give a women power and they'll go a mile with that shot lmaoo anyway what did is what football players do to congradulate another player on a good play they all do it. he was basically congradlating his lawyer on a good job he did but now this women is clearly clueless to what it ment. then she has the nerve to say the court was laughing and that he mad a joke out of it. get real! what the people in the courtroom do cant be controlled. if the judge said something and someone found it funny you gonna give the 30 days in jail? no this is just proof that out justice system is a true joke.
 
jaym7018

jaym7018

Warrior
AK Pig Of The Hut said:
Contempt of court is a court order which in the context of a court trial or hearing, declares a person or organization to have disobeyed or been disrespectful of the court's authority. Often referred to simply as "contempt," such as a person "held in contempt," it is the judge's strongest power to impose sanctions for acts which disrupt the court's normal process.
A finding of contempt of court may result from a failure to obey a lawful order of a court, showing disrespect for the judge, disruption of the proceedings through poor behaviour, or publication of material deemed likely to jeopardize a fair trial. A judge may impose sanctions such as a fine or jail for someone found guilty of contempt of court. Judges in common law systems usually have more extensive power to declare someone in contempt than judges in civil law systems. The client or person must be proven to be guilty before he/she will be punished.
In civil cases involving disputes between private citizens, the behaviour resulting in the ruling is often directed at one of the parties involved rather than at the court directly.
A person found in contempt of court is called a "contemnor." To prove contempt, the prosecutor or complainant must prove the four elements of contempt:
  • Existence of a lawful order
  • The potential contemnor's knowledge of the order
  • The potential contemnor's ability to comply
  • The potential contemnor's failure to comply
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_court
GGs
Click to expand...
Thanks for making it even more clear he didnt do anything wrong.
 
LionHeart V1

LionHeart V1

You will feel deaths cold embrace
AK Pig Of The Hut said:
Contempt of court is a court order which in the context of a court trial or hearing, declares a person or organization to have disobeyed or been disrespectful of the court's authority. Often referred to simply as "contempt," such as a person "held in contempt," it is the judge's strongest power to impose sanctions for acts which disrupt the court's normal process.
A finding of contempt of court may result from a failure to obey a lawful order of a court, showing disrespect for the judge, disruption of the proceedings through poor behaviour, or publication of material deemed likely to jeopardize a fair trial. A judge may impose sanctions such as a fine or jail for someone found guilty of contempt of court. Judges in common law systems usually have more extensive power to declare someone in contempt than judges in civil law systems. The client or person must be proven to be guilty before he/she will be punished.
In civil cases involving disputes between private citizens, the behaviour resulting in the ruling is often directed at one of the parties involved rather than at the court directly.
A person found in contempt of court is called a "contemnor." To prove contempt, the prosecutor or complainant must prove the four elements of contempt:
  • Existence of a lawful order
  • The potential contemnor's knowledge of the order
  • The potential contemnor's ability to comply
  • The potential contemnor's failure to comply
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_court
GGs
Click to expand...
Then she should have sent the people laughing off to jail as well. She wouldn't have even said anything if people didn't start laughing. So you are telling me that chad purposely slapped his attorney on the ass to get a response from the people behind him?
 
jaym7018

jaym7018

Warrior
Honestly middle aged snooty white woman. She probably is a basketball wives fan. Or one of the terrible bitch wife shows.
 
Zyphox

Zyphox

What is going on guys, Ya Boi Zyphox here.
MorbidAltruism said:
I hope no one from this thread ever goes to court...
Click to expand...
i would flip ape shit if i even suspected subjective decisions by the judge, i can't control my self in such a manor in court when i know how fucking retarded the system is, i'd rather sit in jail for 30 fucking days then keep my mouth shut while some fool can sit there and epitomize how hypocritical the law is sometimes in this country and how "constitutional" the fucking constitution really is. i hate the republic we live in just knowing how hypocritically it really is....but let me stop being a hipster.
 
C

c_brandon

Noob
any American that supports what the judge did here is Anti-American and I'd even go so far to say a racist... to see someone praise Due Process being thrown out the window is sickening
 
You must log in or register to reply here.