salvificblood
Worst Sub-Zero Ever
Matchup numbers put Sub-Zero (thanks to Tom's work entirely, to be honest), in the top 3 of mk9's tier lists back in the early days. People don't even consider him a solid mid tier now, more like low mid/low tier. Remember how matchup numbers put Sonya blade way down and then people like Foxy grampa started blowing people up with her and she gradually became recognised as a top 5 character? Same for Jax who was buffed becaus ehe was originally thought to be trash.I have great respect for Tom Brady but honestly he is completely wrong here.
To say at this point in the game that "everyone is OP" is the height of myopic thinking. There are clearly characters better than others, with more tools than others, who can shut others down almost completely. Match-up numbers are becoming apparent, and for many it is not pretty.
It is not too early to start talking about these things. It is not too early to point out obvious differences, deficiencies, and exploits.
It does not make Injustice a bad game to point this stuff out. It does not make Injustice a failure to state the obvious. Quite the opposite actually - Injustice will only grow and prosper if we do confront tiers head on, and not hide our heads in the sand, repeating "everyone is op" over and over again.
The simple fact is, there's like 10 characters who have consistently been called "op" or "broken" ALREADY. It's fine to b*tch about something you don't understand yet, but this nerfs and buffs mentality so so early in the game's life is really weird to me. Are you not still concentrating on learning your character, matchups and trying to develope more solid mechanics?