First of all, the statement that "most people just complain" is a general statement that is not directed at you, because well, "most people" is a phrase that could not possibly be misinterpretted as a direct address rather than a generalization. So, I'll just ignore your repeat quotes of yourself that are totally irrelevant.
Now, why don't you tell me why you think simply stating that a CG to start a combo (which was specifically called out as the scaling reset combo, so "other combos" can be completely ignored and are completely irrelevant), is in any way a bias and not a statement of fact? The bomb trap combo starts with a command grab. That command grab can be teched. That's a bias? You may want to re-evaluate your interpretation of what a bias actually is.
What you called "bias #2" is another simple statement of fact. Hits are breakable. The point there, which apparently needs explanation, is that if the combo is breakable just like every other combo, then it's not overpowered or imbalanced at all. It's not a neutral argument at all when there's people saying that they shouldn't have to use their meter to break Cyrax's combo.
"Bias #3" is yet another statement of fact coupled with an assumption that you've based on false premises. I am talking about the combo without netting first. Starting the combo from a net can be completely ignored. Go back and read the thread because I don't like repeating myself. And again, calling the CG techable isn't a bias. It's just flat out true.
Bias #4, yet another statement of fact. Hits can't be teched but throws can was exactly my point.
Bias #5, Any combo beginning with a hit instead of a throw can be blocked. But, blocking the first hit doesn't stop the person from continuing the combo. Teching a throw stops everything entirely and the combo cannot be continued in any way shape or form. You need to press one button to stop the command grab. In other combos where overheads are involved, you need to standing block / low block accordingly, which cannot possibly be as easy as pressing one button to tech the CG, which flat out halts the combo and leaves zero chance that any subsequent hit will land, which is not true for combos consisting of hit starters. Since you're so infatuated with quoting yourself though, maybe you should go back and read that you said that teching a throw is at least the same degree of difficulty as blocking a hit. Which speaks to my point that defense of the command grab scaling reset bomb trap is no harder than any other combo. You actually agreed with me there. And, since this combo is the only one that I'm aware of that starts with a throw, it is the only combo that can be teched and completely halted from the beginning, which means it's the only combo in the game where the most effective counter is to do even LESS than correctly block a couple hits.
You tried taking the same statement of fact and trying to turn it into 5 separate biased statements, and did a very poor job of it because you effectively said, "you are biased five times because you said the CG can be teched and subsequent hits can be broken."
Maybe I'm also just biased if I tell you that the Canucks beat the Sharks last night. Taking clear statement of indisputable facts and calling them biased doesn't make them so. Quoting them in a manner that even more clearly shows them to be statements of fact do not help you in proving that they are biased statements (let me help you. Saying something that's true isn't biased).
Your entire post is based on the premise that I'm biased in my statements, and you tried to show this by incorrectly using the word 5 times whle trying to apply it to the same thing. It would be like if I quoted you saying that I was biased, and then was like, "omg see right here! this proves you are a racist!"
This shouldn't be surprising though, this is afterall a discussion about Cyrax.
Feel free to PM me if you want to continue this discussion, but some trivial banter is not worthy of derailing this thread, especially considering you're not even opposed to the combo.. So, is there any real reason that anyone can offer as to why the "bomb trap" needs to be removed? I still count zero good ones in 8.5 pages.