Pros Vs Casuals : The pros pay their dues by travelling all over the country/North America. They play what is considered the absolute highest competition. Casuals play over 5000 matches a year, but their experience is deemed inferior to those that play the top level players. Opinons of the casuals are often scrutinized/ rebuked.
I don't want to just harp on this; but I still don't understand how playing 5000 pickup games a year allows you to tell Kobe Bryant that he's wrong about how to win basketball games.
I think it's people's fixation with wanting to feel like their experience is equivalent.. But to be honest, regardless of how good your theory is, there are just some things you don't learn until you try them consistently at a high level and see what happens.
Like I said before, it's ok to disagree -- but anyone who thinks their litany of online casuals is enough to tell a bunch of top players that they're wrong about things that are winning them matches vs. other top players, is part of the problem imo rather than the solution.
Like coolwhip said, experienced opinions add value to the site; and if people can't accept their theories as theories and have to constantly tell every great player who shares information that they're 100% wrong, no one at that level is going to want to stick around and share info.
"I have a theory that you might be wrong.. But I don't have the high level experience to back it up. Just a theory"
is different from:
"You're totally wrong and you're going to get blown up for using that.. And I'll argue with you to the death even though I have no high-level evidence/experience to back it up".