I'm with you on Injustice.
I don't usually talk about this stuff, but: I paid for KDZ's registration and game fee after EMP screwed him for a major that he ultimately won. Why? Because I wanted to see good competition there. I sent money to one of our scene's best-known players so that they could go to SCR. And when I noticed that WNF and NLBC were putting on great tournaments every week that weren't being talked about, I
started writing articles to help being attention to the weeklies. I even sent bread to NLBC for the pot to try to encourage people to come out.
That's what you do to help to build a scene. If our attitude was "this game isn't as big as SF, so the tournaments can't be any good" the Injustice scene would have died after 3 months.
Every game has the "new game different" troubles. When SF4 came out, a number of notable 3rd Strike players refused to play it. A bunch of people called it scrubby and criticized everything from the comeback mechanics, to option selects. The game was broken, and that's when the whole "
pick a top tier" meme started. We forget all this in hindsight. Likewise with T7 > T8 there's been heavy criticism, and top players who
just aren't feeling the new game.
Growing pains are normal.
When all the MKX money came in (riding the Injustice hype), a lot of people forgot that scenes need to be built from the ground up. Criticising is fine, but you don't need to go overboard to the point that you are
only putting out negative content, not promoting any of your events, and literally trying to discourage people from showing up. If the SF5 community didn't make excuses for SF5, we have none for MK1.