SaltShaker
In Zoning We Trust
Ridiculous in what sense? Ridiculous in the sense of pretty much all the characters are ridiculous in one way or another? Absolutely. Ridiculous in the sense that he's superior to all or most of the other characters? Nah not at all.Then idk what you’re arguing against. If you truly acknowledge that he’s a ridiculous character, then that’s that.
Not sure what you've been seeing, but there have been plenty of people crying to the moon about OP/Broken/etc. Johnny got some of it too, who also is fine imo, as no one has seen anything problematic on a game that literally hasn't released yet or even has shown the roster. The "overwhelming" part is going to lead to what I'm saying next.Idk how many people have been saying he’s a “godlike broken character”, I actually don’t think I’ve seen anyone say that. Not that it hasn’t happened, I just haven’t seen it.
But, he definitely IS an overwhelming character to deal with especially when he has his puppet Sento out.
Hardly any gaps ≠ no gaps. But also, even if there was a ton of gaps, that doesn’t mean they’re super easy to punish. Because all Kenshi has to do is block when there is a gap. You try to punish, then get blown up. Aside from that, the gaps aren’t super easy to read. Most of the time the only reason people find the gaps is because they’re mashing in block stun. Y’all don’t seem to understand the extent of what Kenshi is capable of which is fine. The problem is when you act like it doesn’t exist for whatever reason.
What you're saying, tbh just sounds like a lack of experience. You yourself state you're a lab monster. I feel like a lot of your comments here won't age well once you're in the lab working out the counter tech. I played 20 hours of the beta, exclusively Kenshi and Johnny. They both are strong imo, but both appear to be well balanced. To me, 5 out of 6 beta characters were very strong, which is the goal in balance. You make statements like "Y’all don’t seem to understand the extent of what Kenshi is capable of which is fine", but I do. I was DOING a lot of the setups you saw others do online. I can give you hard to blocks, armor breakers, frame traps, etc. on the spot. I had a 72% win rate. But while playing the character I also saw the weaknesses that most people, because they don't have a lab and barely/never fought Kenshi, were allowing to happen. Any character will look much better if opponents don't punish them correctly or don't even know how or when to punish them correctly. All of that resolves as people learn MUs over time.
The obvious answer is of course it's fair. Have you never seen a puppet character attack while the character blocks before lol? Kenshi MK1 isn't the first, and won't be the last.Here is a good litmus test. Do you think it’s completely fair game, or perhaps broken to be able to attack with Sento while Kenshi is blocking?
It's a beta with 6 characters and 4 kameos, where almost all of them look strong. Overreacting to a pre-released game is a MUCH bigger issue. A good and recent example of this is in SF6 everyone from online warrior to elite pro had Manon in their Top 8, many Top 5, in June. After a few weeks people started to find a lot of her "strong dominating pressure" wasn't real and/or had interrupt gaps, making it difficult for her to establish her game by month two. Now the debate is whether she is bottom 5. That's all in the span of two months. Imagine if she had been nerfed like people were crying to do nonstop the first few weeks? Same situation here. Without MU Exp and lab exp things appear a lot differently than what they are fairly often.