So it's not the peoples' fault for rephrasing his words, not reading warning labels, or just overall being idiots?
It's his fault they drank lysol because he asked a question, wasn't sure if it was a stupid question or not and didn't make it obvious enough that it was a question even though it had a questionmark at the end?.....
.....and then afterwards it got an answer as well. Seems pretty cut and dry to me but maybe I'm reading into things that aren't there.
Are we going to have to start telling people that The Walking Dead is just a TV show soon? Do we need to tell people drinking blood doesn't turn you into a vampire?
If the president of the United States of America, in the middle of a Covid-19 update, starts rambling about how he heard something about the dead coming back to life, and maybe there is something we can do to save them after all. That we should probably have someone looking at that, then yeah. You bet we are going to have to tell some people that Zombies aren't real.
Yeah, there are people doing not smart things. That's not news, that's super expected. We know this about the world. It's super consistent. These are also people he is in charge of looking after. I get it, it has to be hard never say anything somebody won't take the wrong way or end up hating you for. I wouldn't want to be in that situation, or carry that weight. It has to suck, and it has to be no way to win a lot of times.
If this were even remotely isolated as a behavior I would be like "that wasn't great. Ooops". But then I can't imaging someone that has been pushing the line so hard with this sort of thing, right up to the point of inviting it to happen. Usually he can just tell the hurricanes to go to Alabama and everything works out. It's not a case of the one time he slipped and said something silly, it was just one time where it backfired and people got hurt. Anything even vaguely sounding like an apology or understanding that maybe it wasn't the best time for that discussion would be great, but I don't know that he has ever done such a thing.
I think it's fine to some degree understand that it took more than one person's actions to end up with someone in an ER, but one of them said he was the President and doubled down when offered a chance to walk back or mitigate the impact of what he was doing as he was doing it. One of them is a world stage leader in the context of informing the public about what is new in a health crisis. People are serious mode. I'm really not looking to hate on him RN in the traditional sense, but I don't think claiming he didn't birth the situation and that it's all on the peasants is factually sound.
At this point it's all done. He can't undo it, and I think most of it has course corrected. We will have something new to worry about in the next couple of days I'm sure.
I'm also sure I've got way too much time to just type long runs of crap on this site for no good reason. Life is just weird right now, and I really want some brownies.