Okay, you've got me this time. That was silly.Batman stance...
I havent argued against or for that.You're 100% right, but that's exactly why there's a title for "concept artist" and "animator/modeler" and all other titles. The little words are telling the world that these people assigned to said task are SUPPOSED to be individuals that have the "knowledge" and "skills" to perform at a professional level in said field.
Depends on the what field they go into. Technical effects artists, 3D prop and environment artists really dont need any drawing skills. Character and animation it helps.That being said, it is true that there's a ironic effect that digital mediums have on traditional artists and vice versa, but I will tell you this, and it will be noticed in time, any exceptional artist that does mediocre digital work, will eventually surpass any non traditional artist. Reason being is because traditional art is the core of which animation bases itself off of in understanding all forms of anatomy. They have the best foundation you can ask for, they're just working on applying it to an entirely new canvas, and once they do, you can expect some insane work out of them. Its not to discredit non traditional artists or those that don't draw in general, but what's missing is that barrier from illusion to creation, which is what lets artists literally combust in imagination
4 years of art school.Tell me more about your experience in either drawing or 3D modeling.
Also rendering is what the computer does to generate the 3d or 2d model into an image. Or in art when you mention you're rendering something its applying light to your piece (usually highlights).
If you want some anecdotal evidence to the contrary of modeling in 3d compared to painting I can tell you that several of my classmates (I'm in video game graphics school) are exceptional at painting but make some highly mediocre models and sculpts.
Likewise others in my class have excellent understanding of anatomy and proportion when sculpting but cant fucking draw for shit.
That's the latest news though, not much else to discuss, just that.It amazes me that this has been one of the top threads for days and that we are for the most part this collectively concerned of how the females look in our games.
A good 3D artist can translate the 2D concept art in an accurate manner within the limitations of the 3D engine. That's their entire job. When a 3D artist can't do that, they've failed at their job and need to improve. Period.I don't even understand how you can assume something that stupid.
Art is not an interchangeable medium in which being able to do/ having people able to do something in one area means that other areas will magically follow suit by virtue of also being forms of art.
Wondering why a group of 3D artists can't portray characters like a group of 2D artists is like wondering why a group of auto mechanics can't fix boats like a group of boat mechanics.
Dude. Cassie Cage face model is ugly as hell. Its not like two couples created a baby and there you go cassie cage. They draw her and it came out lookin like shit. My first impression when I saw the character was " she ugly ass hell" How come when different games like Killer Instinct, Street Fighter or Tekken can properly make a woman face and why does neatherrealm struggle to do so? Well im not going to say struggle because if you look at the concept art for wonderwoman in injustice. Those concept art look way better then the actually final copy of the character. I personally think they actually choose to make there character look ugly. Lol. devorah look better then cassie cage in my opinionNot sure if everyone is aware of this... but most women arent supermodels..
They should make butterface male characters to make it more fair then.Why they make butterface women, everything fine but-her-face?
Men and women are not the same. That's why there has been "The 100 Sexiest Women in Comics" but no such list for men, go figure.They should make butterface male characters to make it more fair then.
uh, because someone with a vagina might want to play it.I don't like the "no more pole dancers"route. What's wrong with that?
Not sure if you r serious here.uh, because someone with a vagina might want to play it.
I really don't know what's so complicated about her lol why can't they just do her right ! def she's getting better but I honestly don't understand why is this so hard to make her look like a girl lol
Bae means poopKotal still looking like a bae.
I wouldn't think that, maybe that's just me.Too bad She still looks like a man.
Wow only going to play her because IF she looks pretty?Still waiting for the final design, if it looks good I'm going to pick her up as a second... because air guns
No her overall design in general. I'm not that shallow Also aesthetics are a big deal for me in gaming...hence why I really like Dvorah. FoolWow only going to play her because IF she looks pretty?
She's amazing. Although I'd say that I'm not big on AC costume port. Something about her face in it was off IMO.I will give NRS credit where credit is due, Harley Quinn is their best looking female to date in any of their games, her alternate costume in game was legit, and even tho the arkham city costume wasn't originally their work, they incorporated it in to the game well, even without her make up she would have looked good...NRS you are capable, your work with Harley shows it....step your shit up senpai! No more half assness with face paint, and cover up masks!