Each of them count differently, which is why EVO counts the most. And winning MLG is way easier than winning EVO. For starters, the entries are always under a 100 for MLG. EVO has had over 300 entries for both MK tournaments. The competition at EVO is more than 3x as difficult. To top it off, people spend a year preparing BEFORE the tournament which just goes to show you what crazy amounts of preparation and training goes into it for such an event.
Players you may never even play, even with 300 + players you need to win......what? 8 matches to win the entire tournament if you don't get sent to losers? As opposed to MLG where you have 5 if you aren't sent to losers. I'm simply skewing the numbers since being sent to losers early on would make it a lot harder to move on at EVO than MLG and I see what you're saying.....At the same time alot of the people that go to EVO
only go to EVO and sometimes they aren't that great so those numbers themselves are padded.
To top it off, people spend a year preparing BEFORE the tournament which just goes to show you what crazy amounts of preparation and training goes into it for such an event.
Sure, but they train all year round while still going to other tournaments more often then not. There's hardly top players that go to just EVO, no matter how much practice you have you can't prepare for different human beings and going to tournaments are the best way to learn matchups anyway.
Do you even grasp how good you have to stand a chance at an event like this with all of these variables and players there? Nothing comes close.
Clearly I don't as I've never won a major (Youmacon Battle Opera is a regional, if anything), let alone EVO. Still, the possibility of having to fight 6-7 more matches against players that are
potentially really good isn't that different from possibly fighting 3-4 more matches with players you
know are really good.