Tweedy
Champion
I must have missed when he used him. Did he use him at all at CEO? I only saw him use Tanya.Reo confirmed a noob.
I must have missed when he used him. Did he use him at all at CEO? I only saw him use Tanya.Reo confirmed a noob.
Forgot Sonyaquote
ECT it wasn't a spectacular Erron Black but good enough to get top 8I must have missed when he used him. Did he use him at all at CEO? I only saw him use Tanya.
He used him at ECT and the past couple locals between his Yomi teammates. Probably not a coincidence that Yomi players are the most consistent at blowing up Erron's holes up close.I must have missed when he used him. Did he use him at all at CEO? I only saw him use Tanya.
Ah okay, I didn't watch most of ECT. I'm sure there's a reason that he dropped him, BUT, i'm wondering if he'll go back to him after the inevitable Tanya nerf.He used him at ECT and the past couple locals between his Yomi teammates. Probably not a coincidence that Yomi players are the most consistent at blowing up Erron's holes up close.
He got top 8 with a one week erron. The character is really good lolECT it wasn't a spectacular Erron Black but good enough to get top 8
I wouldn't really say he dropped him, he just wasn't given an adequate reason to come off Tanya at CEO. I am however extremely shocked that he apparently doesn't play Marksman with Erron.Ah okay, I didn't watch most of ECT. I'm sure there's a reason that he dropped him, BUT, i'm wondering if he'll go back to him after the inevitable Tanya nerf.
If tournaments aren't gonna make a distinction between variations and characters, why should tier lists?Tournament rules don't determine whether a variation is a character. A variation is a variation and a character is a character, consisting of 3 variations. You can't change variations after winning because it risks putting the loser at a huge handicap and it would be a silly tournament rule within the context of this game, not because variations are considered characters of their own on the tier list. Yes, variations play different, sometimes significantly so, hence the winner can't change, but when making a tier list, a character is a character. If you change a character after a loss, then you've changed a character. If you change a variation, then you've changed a variation. Not sure why it needs to be overcomplicated.
Did you see REO" The washed up veteran" learned Shinnok and in day 2 place 2nd in a Yomi internal tournament.He got top 8 with a one week erron. The character is really good lol
Pretty anecdotal point. Reo could probably place top 8 in a major with a week one anyone in the top 20 lol. I also doubt that he just picked him up a week before ECT. I've seen streams of him using EB during the first month of the game.He got top 8 with a one week erron. The character is really good lol
Even I don't think she's that bad.Damn, that takeda and jacqui downplay.
Come on... really? Really? You think Erron Black is not a top 10 character? If anything he's too low on this list.I'm not surprised that Erron Black is that low. I think Sonicfox's dominance and the low amount of effort it takes to get decent with him is deceiving. You don't see any other top players using Erron Black. If anything he should be lower IMO.
Quote me...Even I don't think she's that bad.
Mastering one character with 3 different variations is in theory, easier than learning a whole new character. You CAN change variations, just after a loss. It DOES matter if the variation covers a bad match-up because you can go to that variation instead of going to a new character. I know what you're trying to say but you're looking at it the wrong way.If tournaments aren't gonna make a distinction between variations and characters, why should tier lists?
It doesn't mean anything if my character has 3 strong variations, if I can't change between them during a set. I gain no advantage from knowing all 3 variations of my character that I wouldn't gain from knowing 1 single variation from three separate characters.
Say for instance I pick Character A variation 1 and my opponent picks Character B variation 1. I win and my opponent picks Character C which hard counters Character A variation 1. It doesn't matter if variation 2 of character A beats character C because I can't change! If I lose, I could switch to character A variation 2 or I could switch to Character D who also beats Character C. Do you understand why it doesn't matter if the other variations can cover bad MUs? I might as well just pick up another character to cover that bad MU. For all intents and purposes, each variation is its own separate character and should be treated as such.
Sure, I understand simplifying by taking a character's 'best' variation and going from there, and I understand what a complete clusterfuck a variation-based tier list might look like (and also the fact that we haven't explored certain variations enough to accurately rank them) but that doesn't mean that's what we shouldn't be moving towards, or what the 'best' tier list for MK X would look like.
There's like, 3 people who downplay him (of which I'm one). Everyone else upplays him, if anything.Tempest Lao is rightfully in the Top 5 discussion where he belongs! I'm tired of the downplaying. Kenshi and Erron should probably be swapped though.
Bahahashahaa, kenshi is braindead now SHUTUP!Kenshi is top 10 "in theory". As with Zod and Bane; whether anyone actually uses the character well enough to warrant such a high placement is yet to be seen