Both Dick (Nightwing) and Damian (Robin) are visible on one page,Who is the fan-favorite hero who makes an appearance?
What, you didn't see him?Who is the fan-favorite hero who makes an appearance?
think so... the whale was in issue 10 tooWhat, you didn't see him?
It was clearly the whale.
Seriously, it was probably Alfred.
I'm sorry fans of Injustice Elseworld's Wife-Killing Grimdark Supercrazyman, but Batman should have taken out Superman by now what with him being a raving lunatic who has betrayed his hero mantle.
The Justice League is supposed to be the check against any member going rogue, but Batman should have realized issues ago that it was ultimately up to him to save Supes from himself and others by containing him.
Kryptonite + Red Sunlight Jail Cell, maybe the Phantom Zone if no prison can hold him. Probably have to take out Wonder Woman too now that she's Superman's henchwoman, but Bats can be brutal on people who he knows can take the punishment.
Didn't get a chance to read it yet.What, you didn't see him?
Supes is having a temper tantrum about events outside Batman's control but doesn't seem to realize that he caused the kidnapping of his own parents by revealing his identity to everyone on earth.Raving lunatic? He's a very sad and lonely man who feels that his best friend has allowed this tragedy by not doing more again the Joker. He also feels hurt and betrayed that Bruce would not help him look for his kidnapped parents.
Killing Joker is a kind act at this point, so not what I'm talking about. More like putting the entire earth on a no fly zone, blowing up anyone who violates it, and destablilizing nations and entire regions against the wishes of his country, the United States of America. He may have started out an undocumented immigrant but he is still a citizen of the country and subject to the law.Betray the hero mantle? How? By killing a monster? Ollie has killed, Diana has killed, heroes kill sometime but he's not slaughtering innocent people.....In fact he literally just stopped a nation bombing their practically defenseless neighbors, again, how did he betray it?
Fair enough, but once it became clear Superman wouldn't listen to reason, Bats should have gone with Plan B immediately.At this point Bruce could've easily been thinking that talking to Clark would help, even though it didn't.
Supes is having a temper tantrum about events outside Batman's control but doesn't seem to realize that he caused the kidnapping of his own parents by revealing his identity to everyone on earth.
Killing Joker is a kind act at this point, so not what I'm talking about. More like putting the entire earth on a no fly zone, blowing up anyone who violates it, and destablilizing nations and entire regions against the wishes of his country, the United States of America. He may have started out an undocumented immigrant but he is still a citizen of the country and subject to the law.
Fair enough, but once it became clear Superman wouldn't listen to reason, Bats should have gone with Plan B immediately.
If Joker can somehow rig Lois up with a nuclear bomb trigger after hours of complicated heart surgery and trick Superman, Batman should be able to at least stop him and get help from other heroes sooner than he does.
The victim is somehow to blame? What the hell kind of logic is that.Supes is having a temper tantrum about events outside Batman's control but doesn't seem to realize that he caused the kidnapping of his own parents by revealing his identity to everyone on earth.
It's a two sided coin though. Superman's perspective is that those same laws protected villainy, and its true, they did. In issue six, Superman literally stopped a bomb that would have obliterated a city full of innocents, with zero life loss. A fair trial would have allowed Joker to kill someone else's baby whenever he got out, which he would do. This is why he blames Bruce, because Bruce knows this, everyone knows this, and yet Bruce allows the Joker to persist out of fear of the future. Anyone living in fear of the future is doomed to fail. Once that fear infects The Regime, its over.Killing Joker is a kind act at this point, so not what I'm talking about. More like putting the entire earth on a no fly zone, blowing up anyone who violates it, and destablilizing nations and entire regions against the wishes of his country, the United States of America. He may have started out an undocumented immigrant but he is still a citizen of the country and subject to the law.
When would Batman come up with a plan B? In issue 4 or 5, we saw Batman talking to Joker, telling him that he didn't believe Supes would go over the deep end. And even now, Batman has to admit that maybe Clark is right. For once we're seeing a Batman that isn't just morally in the right. He's failed as a friend to Clark, and a hero to Metropolis, and for what? To hide in his cave, drink tea and ignore his kids?Fair enough, but once it became clear Superman wouldn't listen to reason, Bats should have gone with Plan B immediately.
If Joker can somehow rig Lois up with a nuclear bomb trigger after hours of complicated heart surgery and trick Superman, Batman should be able to at least stop him when he sees Supes going over the edge and get help from other heroes sooner than he does.
It was a dumb move though, and the results are predictable.The victim is somehow to blame? What the hell kind of logic is that.
Once Supes crowns himself the eternal leader of the Regime, it becomes about him and his fear of not being able to save everyone so he must control everyone, not about saving lives. Using his power for altrustic purposes is noble but needs to be tempered with a moral code of restraint and self-control. A Superman who doesn't control himself leads down to godly tyranny in any story that tackles the question.This is why he blames Bruce, because Bruce knows this, everyone knows this, and yet Bruce allows the Joker to persist out of fear of the future. Anyone living in fear of the future is doomed to fail. Once that fear infects The Regime, its over.
I don't like how detached they portray Batman here either, but I hate even more this idea he's a shitty father. If they stopped killing off his kids he might be seen as the successful mentor to many young heroes that he is, including non-Batfamily teams like the Outsiders or the Club of Heroes, and can take up that role again when written well.When would Batman come up with a plan B? In issue 4 or 5, we saw Batman talking to Joker, telling him that he didn't believe Supes would go over the deep end. And even now, Batman has to admit that maybe Clark is right. For once we're seeing a Batman that isn't just morally in the right. He's failed as a friend to Clark, and a hero to Metropolis, and for what? To hide in his cave, drink tea and ignore his kids?
I think you're projecting on the story a bit. We don't even know what happens or why it takes 5 years for the Regime to start to come apart. It might not even be that Superman just loses his shit. Can you list something he has done at this point in the story that is less than altruistic?Once Supes crowns himself the eternal leader of the Regime, it becomes about him and his fear of not being able to save everyone so he must control everyone, not about saving lives. Using his power for altrustic purposes is noble but needs to be tempered with a moral code of restraint and self-control. A Superman who doesn't control himself leads down to godly tyranny in any story that tackles the question.
But what is Batman truly mentoring? Think about it. As a father, or just a role model, what is Batman actually hoping to sire in his heirs? A life of fighting didn't help him exorcise his demons, so why would he inflict that on these other damaged children who come to him for guidance?I don't like how detached they portray Batman either, but I hate even more this idea he's a shitty father. If they stopped killing off his kids he might be seen as the successful mentor to many young heroes that he is, and can take up that role again when written well.
luthor can be a force of good you know. if only he was left alone without superheroes everywhereUnless we see Supes and co locking up civies maybe they aren't that bad I mean hell look at who Batman's working with*Harley and Luthor*
No matter which way you slice it, Superman is still out of line. He knows how the Joker is from all the stories he's either heard from Batman, or seen on the news. That said he doesn't do a damn thing till Joker attacks him personally, and now it's all the world isn't right. He may have good intentions but that doesn't change the fact he is just as much to blame for everything the Joker did.
What is out of line tho? What has Superman actually done besides upset beaurocrats who weren't capable of protecting their people to begin with?No matter which way you slice it, Superman is still out of line. He knows how the Joker is from all the stories he's either heard from Batman, or seen on the news. That said he doesn't do a damn thing till Joker attacks him personally, and now it's all the world isn't right. He may have good intentions but that doesn't change the fact he is just as much to blame for everything the Joker did.
WW is taking the role of bad cop while Supes plays good cop, but the whole Superman is overcome with emotion and must act stuff suggests he's really in mourning and acting from a selfish place.I think you're projecting on the story a bit. We don't even know what happens or why it takes 5 years for the Regime to start to come apart. It might not even be that Superman just loses his shit. Can you list something he has done at this point in the story that is less than altruistic?
By my reckoning, the biggest douche in the story right now is WW.
Why is it good for the kids? Great education and comfy living arrangments, lead a life dedicated to the selfless service to others as a great hero as opposed to being a hoodlum. In the DCU being a hero is a respected occupation (usually) so you can't think of it in real world terms.But what is Batman truly mentoring? Think about it. As a father, or just a role model, what is Batman actually hoping to sire in his heirs? A life of fighting didn't help him exorcise his demons, so why would he inflict that on these other damaged children who come to him for guidance?
Clark knows that Bruce can take care of him aka(lock the Joker up again).What I'm saying is once he kills Lois, now Superman's all "Why didn't you end him". He didn't do that when Joker killed or injured anyone else. Clark can blame Batman all he wants but in the end he is just as responsible.Bruce can handle Joker and Clark KNOWS Bruce can handle Joker as he always stops him so why should Clark step in? Also, why hasn't Bruce ever asked Clark to throw Joker in the phantom zone?
Out of line as far as laying all the blame on BatmanWhat is out of line tho? What has Superman actually done besides upset beaurocrats who weren't capable of protecting their people to begin with?
Then all heroes are responsible for all evil in the world if it happens again is what you're saying?Clark knows that Bruce can take care of him aka(lock the Joker up again).What I'm saying is once he kills Lois, now Superman's all "Why didn't you end him". He didn't do that when Joker killed or injured anyone else. Clark can blame Batman all he wants but in the end he is just as responsible.