INJUSTICE at Tournaments: Should interactables be legal or illegal?

[Solo]

If interactables get banned wouldn't that take the point of Injustice away. IMO.. it wouldn't feel like it's own game anymore.

This is what they wanted Injustice to be known for. 90% of the trailers is showing off some kind of interactables.


Edit: Imagine being beat by a dumpster? So embarrassing..

 

[CURBOLICOUS]

Why are there people complaining about that 90%combo? We had to deal with cyrax why not have another version of him in this game? }=)

 

[CCVengeance]

leave them on.That is all and those that dont agree like this post.

 

[CCVengeance]

Yes banned. I'm still surprised this is even debated

I am dissapoint..

 

[GearDigital]

The game would suffer if they were banned. Honestly, it's a core part of the game, and removing them would take some of the hype out of the game. And that combo was situational as all hell and against a non-moving opponent.

 

[Vilén]

Given what it takes to get someone into this combo, I think the damage is pretty fair.

Like, you deserve to get one combo'd if you get hit with that shit.

 

[Euphoric]

Keep them on, they seem hype, nothing wrong with em, should people Ban X-Factor Phoenix too, she's pretty situation based!

 

[CCVengeance]

Look let's wait how it goes and dont ban them.IF they are SO utterly broken I will main a character I dont like for you guys!

 

[CCVengeance]

A near TOD combo that is highly situational and people get mad.Meanwhile Marvel has actual TOD and people go fap.

 

[Tom Brady]

The game is new to all of you, in time you will learn to deal with them.

 

[Limelights]

I haven't watched too much gameplay but I know that it's too early to tell. I think it's best if we try and work with the interactions and let NRS patch what needs to be patched. Like the poll said, it adds hype to the game.

 

[CCVengeance]

The game is new to all of you, in time you will learn to deal with them.

Based Brady has spoken.Now kneel and deal with it!

 

[Soul Bound X]

Why are there people complaining about that 90%combo? We had to deal with cyrax why not have another version of him in this game? }=)

atleast you might of had a breaker

 

[Soul Bound X]

The game isn't even out. lol. why is this even being discussed right now.

 

[Protagonist_1]

No they shouldn't be banned. Something shouldn't be banned just because there's a knee jerk reaction from the community saying otherwise. It reminds me when REO was doing IGFB on hitbox, and the question on whether or not Kabal should be banned sprang up. Give it time.

Plus, the combo looks pretty situational. I don't know the level of difficulty for that, but seeing it's TONY-T, it's probably pretty difficult to pull off.

 

[Seapeople]

I think they'll be fine in the long run. I think they should be changed to not be guaranteed OTGs in certain situations, and maybe slightly tone down the damage since they do like 20% or so by themselves. Other than that, they seem easy enough to avoid and will definitely make matches more interesting.

 

[1man3letters]

jesus christ,people pissing there pants about stuff on day -3.
even from that combo in the vid,the spaceship thing looks to be smashing not making it a loopable deal.
and it seems like it could only be done on that stage from that position, thats a dumb reason to ban them altogether.
if your against superman in that excact position shouldnt your thoughts be "hmmm he can do 98% here,im going to mbf3 that spaceship and fuck his shit up"
and like been mentioned loads of chars can prob do this shit in same or different stages, it part of the game.

until 200% unescapable combos come with them all theres not reason to ban all them out right,
if some super broken loopable stuff is found, just ban that stage like what weve done with stages in mk9

 

[Zoidberg747]

jesus christ,people pissing there pants about stuff on day -3.
even from that combo in the vid,the spaceship thing looks to be smashing not making it a loopable deal.
and it seems like it could only be done on that stage from that position, thats a dumb reason to ban them altogether.
if your against superman in that excact position shouldnt your thoughts be "hmmm he can do 98% here,im going to mbf3 that spaceship and fuck his shit up"
and like been mentioned loads of chars can prob do this shit in same or different stages, it part of the game.

until 200% unescapable combos come with them all theres not reason to ban all them out right,
if some super broken loopable stuff is found, just ban that stage like what weve done with stages in mk9

People should listen to 1man more. Lol who you interested in in injustice?

 

[VGB Joe Kerr]

There's no need to ban them. Every stage doesn't allow a combo like that superman one, situational or not. you can't do that combo on the gotham stage, or in either arkham asylum. without the bg stuff this game loses a lot, might as well play marvel vs capcom or persona. I believe that for tournament play the bg should be left on until something really super one sided shows up and stage select should be 50/50 as is (both players select a stage and the game chooses) IMO. It's what makes the game, not the dc characters involved. It's a completely different game when the stage aspect is nullified. If damage is that much of an issue make it 3/5 matches go by fast in this game. Just my two cents, I hope someone reads it and actually considerrs it instead of everybody fighting like in most these opinion threads

 

[Hanzer0]

The game doesn't need to be perfectly balanced. Situational things are excited to watch when pulled off, and it's just more game to learn. Keep interactables.

Think about shang tsung or sektor landing an up missle. When it happens in a competitive match everyone thinks "big damage incoming" and it get's people hyped.
Now, imagine Superman has his trait up and lands that interactable: shit just got real.

As long as 80% combos don't become the BnB's, I don't think anyone will consider it lame or broken.

 

[1man3letters]

People should listen to 1man more. Lol who you interested in in injustice?

lol thank ya sir.
well grundy going to be my main.
will use harley quinn aswell.
thought i will have a look at ares/killer frost in training when i get the game.they look interesting to me.
yourself?

 

[Zoidberg747]

lol thank ya sir.
well grundy going to be my main.
will use harley quinn aswell.
thought i will have a look at ares/killer frost in training when i get the game.they look interesting to me.
yourself?

Grundy
Deathstroke
Harley

Kind of funny we seem to want to play similar chars lol.

 

[LuciusAxelrod]

It's not the situational combos that bother me about interactables, it's the asymmetry of the stages. I feel like it could lead to subtle advantages based start position. For example, there could be easy combos into stage transitions possible from the start of the match from the player one side that are more effective than combos without the stage transition from the player two side. There would certainly be counter-strategies for this sort of thing, and the advantage would disappear as players moved around the field and switched positions. But I feel like at the start of the round, players should be on fairly equal footing.
However, I will still use them until major tournament organizers decided on what to allow.

 

[1man3letters]

Grundy
Deathstroke
Harley

Kind of funny we seem to want to play similar chars lol.

yea that a bit strange alright lol
i can see a few tarkatans heading doomsday way aswell

according to art on his stream harley has a strong corner game when she gets you in it with some traps she has so interesting how that will plan out.

 

[Tom Brady]

I have been doing combos like this using the 2x interactable on fortress since before ppl even thought about pirating the game. This is NOTHING to over react to.