What's new

Gun Reform?

LesMore

Top 8 Injustice Frosty Faustings VII
Nah, you are definitely a conspiracy theorist.

If Obama did do this NATO would be all over him and most likely either stop him or take him out of power.

And if he did use soldiers from other countries let him. The United States military is one of the most technologically advanced militaries in the world.

Not that he ever would, because no president of the U.S. has ever done this because it would be really dumb to do so.
Zoidberg I like you so let me just say I am merely pointing out what could happen... I didnt say it was going to, I didnt say that it would happen... i am merely pointing out that this would fit the historical record... please dont put words in my mouth... what I am saying is just as plausible as any of your guys theories... No conspiracy.. I never once said Obama would do any of this...
 

Zoidberg747

My blades will find your heart
Zoidberg I like you so let me just say I am merely pointing out what could happen... I didnt say it was going to, I didnt say that it would happen... i am merely pointing out that this would fit the historical record... please dont put words in my mouth... what I am saying is just as plausible as any of your guys theories... No conspiracy.. I never once said Obama would do any of this...
Then I must have misread.

Are you referring to the coups de tat found in Latin American countries? While I guess it COULD happen, all I am saying is it is a very very low probablity, and even if it did guns would be useless against a military armed with tanks and helicopters.

My apologies for jumping to conclusions.
 

LesMore

Top 8 Injustice Frosty Faustings VII
IMO Congress should repeal the 2nd Amendment and impose an absolute ban on firearms for civilians. These ridiculous scenarios that pro-gun IDIOTS present are amazingly short-sighted.

Hmm, let's consider a scenario: guy shows up to my door with a gun. I open the door, he shoves the gun in my face and tells me to give him all of my money. I, THE BRAVE COWBOY AMERICAN I AM, PULL OUT MY GUN FROM MY HOLSTER. WHAT HAPPENS NEXT, YOU FUCKING MORONS? I GET SHOT IN THE HEAD. You know what would have happened if I didn't have a gun? The dude gets my money and gets his crack fix, whoopdeedoo. At least I'm fucking ALIVE. The same shit happens in the so-called 'hood' you whitebread bitches talk about all the time. When people pull guns on each other in self-defense, PEOPLE GET SHOT. This 'self-protection' BULLSHIT is a FACADE; you're only opening yourself up to getting shot in the face.

And protecting ourselves against the GOVERNMENT? Don't fucking make me laugh. If the US government wants to attack its own people, do you realize how FUCKED you all are, even WITH your guns? You're going to be tear gassed, carpet bombed, nuked, burned with microwave radiation, poisoned with chemical weapons, and shot by SKILLED MARKSMEN with FULLY-AUTOMATIC WEAPONS and the proper gear to survive in this bizarre post-apocalyptic scenario. Any of you who truly rot your minds with FOX News enough to believe that you fucking simpletons will be able to constitute ANY KIND OF WELL-FORMED MILITIA are KIDDING YOURSELVES.

WAKE UP, YOU FUCKING REDNECKS.
Wow you certainly come off sounding like well just silly, no one come to your door and robs you, they break into your house, all you have to do is look through the peephole and realize that you dont know this person and to be carefull in the way you treat them... LIKE how about not opening the door for strangers you dumbass and just saying through the closed door "who is it?".... Guns protecting people works on the micro scale, not the macro scale... No one in their right mind thinks they can fight the goverment with handguns and rifles... the tyranny the constitution means is the boarding of soldiers in your home and the usery that comes with it... Sad to say but guns keep the controling class from pushing the people too far... No one comes to my house and tries to compell my kids to join an army or gang or to influence you or your children because they know the population will not go for it and they WILL attack people who would try to force them... Thats why you have gangs of cops patrolling our cities but for the most part not turning into armed gangs... because they know the armed populace will hold their feet to the fire if they take it too far...
 

Ilthuain

Lost in a labyrinth of egoism
This is actually incorrect.

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_crimes_are_stopped_by_gun_owners

Many crimes are stopped by legal gun owners, whether police or citizens. HOWEVER there are almost no cases where an assault rifle was needed. People need to realize that the gun control debate is less about banning guns and more about how strict restrictions should be and reforming the steps necessary to acquire a gun
I specifically stated "rampages", not "crimes".

I think we mostly agree, however.
 

Zoidberg747

My blades will find your heart
Wow you certainly come off sounding like well just silly, no one come to your door and robs you, they break into your house, all you have to do is look through the peephole and realize that you dont know this person and to be carefull in the way you treat them... LIKE how about not opening the door for strangers you dumbass and just saying through the closed door "who is it?".... Guns protecting people works on the micro scale, not the macro scale... No one in their right mind thinks they can fight the goverment with handguns and rifles... the tyranny the constitution means is the boarding of soldiers in your home and the usery that comes with it... Sad to say but guns keep the controling class from pushing the people too far... No one comes to my house and tries to compell my kids to join an army or gang or to influence you or your children because they know the population will not go for it and they WILL attack people who would try to force them... Thats why you have gangs of cops patrolling our cities but for the most part not turning into armed gangs... because they know the armed populace will hold their feet to the fire if they take it too far...
I dont necessarily agree with this, but I do think it is an interesting point.

Edit:

I specifically stated "rampages", not "crimes".

I think we mostly agree, however.
Semantics :p
 

Illmatix

Remember, representing ermac is illmatic.
Wow you certainly come off sounding like well just silly, no one come to your door and robs you, they break into your house, all you have to do is look through the peephole and realize that you dont know this person and to be carefull in the way you treat them... LIKE how about not opening the door for strangers you dumbass and just saying through the closed door "who is it?".... Guns protecting people works on the micro scale, not the macro scale... No one in their right mind thinks they can fight the goverment with handguns and rifles... the tyranny the constitution means is the boarding of soldiers in your home and the usery that comes with it... Sad to say but guns keep the controling class from pushing the people too far... No one comes to my house and tries to compell my kids to join an army or gang or to influence you or your children because they know the population will not go for it and they WILL attack people who would try to force them... Thats why you have gangs of cops patrolling our cities but for the most part not turning into armed gangs... because they know the armed populace will hold their feet to the fire if they take it too far...
this is true and thats what ive been trying to say, i'm not like "Oh ITS TIME TO FIGHT THE GOVERNMENT!!!!!", guns are necessary to deter usurpation. Look at what the black panthers did to repel abusive police, he had members look out of windows with rifles and told them that tyranny would not stand. People act like this hasnt been necessary before.
 

LesMore

Top 8 Injustice Frosty Faustings VII
Our freedom comes at the cost of communist slaves now making all of our goods, see CHINA... America is addicted to slave labor... once the unions and civil rights stopped allowing our own citizens to be the slaves we just outsourced all the work to modern slaves in communist countries... Now times are so tough people are begging to be dissolve "those damn unions" and become the slaves again, while all along it is just buisness as usual for the rich who control this country....
Oh and by the way who forces these UNARMED communit slaves into gulags to make clothes and plastic garbage for america... THEIR OWN GOVERNMENTS DO THAT TO THEM... so how is it so far fetched something like that couldn't happen here... think about it.. right now while you have fun and type on the internet, WHOLE COUNTRIES FULL OF PEOPLE ARE FORCED INTO SLAVERY BY THEIR OWN RULERS... WHAT DO ALL THESE PEOPLE HAVE IN COMMON... THEY ARE UNARMED!
 

Zoidberg747

My blades will find your heart
Oh and by the way who forces these UNARMED communit slaves into gulags to make clothes and plastic garbage for america... THEIR OWN GOVERNMENTS DO THAT TO THEM... so how is it so far fetched something like that couldn't happen here... think about it.. right now while you have fun and type on the internet, WHOLE COUNTRIES FULL OF PEOPLE ARE FORCED INTO SLAVERY BY THEIR OWN RULERS... WHAT DO ALL THESE PEOPLE HAVE IN COMMON... THEY ARE UNARMED!
And also in some cases uneducated, with no constitution to protect them.

But I see your point.
 

LesMore

Top 8 Injustice Frosty Faustings VII
And also in some cases uneducated, with no constitution to protect them.

But I see your point.
Again I have always agreed with your posts also Zoidberg..very intelligent... I definitely think you and everyone else who even takes the time to debate this are good people..
Also i am sorry to anyone who thought I was raging during my posts... I want to be respectful and consider this issue from all angles...
So i apoligize to anyone I may have offended.... At the end of the day I just want the best for this country and its people who I love immensely...
 

Zoidberg747

My blades will find your heart
Again I have always agreed with your posts also Zoidberg..very intelligent... I definitely think you and everyone else who even takes the time to debate this are good people..
Also i am sorry to anyone who thought I was raging during my posts... I want to be respectful and consider this issue from all angles...
So i apoligize to anyone I may have offended.... At the end of the day I just want the best for this country and its people who I love immensely...
The truth is we all get hasty and get a little defensive when we discuss these issues, they are sensitive issues that will no doubt create a bit of tension. The key is to remember at the end of the day it is just a debate and like you said, consider all the possible angles(Because rarely is one person 100% right, me included)
 

LesMore

Top 8 Injustice Frosty Faustings VII
The truth is we all get hasty and get a little defensive when we discuss these issues, they are sensitive issues that will no doubt create a bit of tension. The key is to remember at the end of the day it is just a debate and like you said, consider all the possible angles(Because rarely is one person 100% right, me included)
And I know I am not right... my argument relies on old history, and hypotheticals... I pose no real solutions, which inevitably reinforces the status quo that is obviously flawed or we would never be having these debates in the first place...
It all leaves me with this stunned look on my face, like life has pwned me...
 

Zoidberg747

My blades will find your heart
And I know I am not right... my argument relies on old history, and hypotheticals... I pose no real solutions, which inevitably reinforces the status quo that is obviously flawed or we would never be having these debates in the first place...
It all leaves me with this stunned look on my face, like life has pwned me...
When I read the last line I looked at your avatar and laughed. Exactly what you describe.
 

ETC AdmiralAugustus

Grabble Frazzled
The only thing I'll add is that people want to "LIMIT" the guns. Like no need for automatic weapons.

Let me ask you this, if there is ever a time we go at war with our own government, do you really think they will use handguns, etc

No, they will use automatic weapons vs us Gunfree, or limited weapon people.

The 2nd amendment is there to protect us from the govt

Jojo, I love you, but this excuse is the lamest one I get from people.

If we go to war with our government, you know, us militia? We are outclassed as fuck. They have tanks, missiles, bombs, etc, etc. Assault rifles would only prolong the inevitable. LBSH

And even if we did go to war with our gov't -- which is very unlikely -- do you not think people would be able to access assault rifles? All military personnel from high ranking officials to grunts aren't going to turn on there own people to kill them. Defects would happen, and I'm sure people would acquire guns. Plus, many of us our stockpiled on weapons too. Montana came in 3rd with 25, 745 per 100,000, with Kentucky and Utah coming in 1st and 2nd respectively. Montana has a population of just over a million, and this was a statistic in 2010. You can't tell me that you WON'T have weapons available to fight your make-believe war.

"Well, it's my right as an American citizen to own whatever firearm I want". This excuse is also lame. I could make the same argument. "Well, it's my right as an American citizen to own a tank", or "...explosive bullets", or "...a nuke", etc. Where do we draw the line?

Don't get me wrong, I go shooting all the time. I love it! It's a great stress reliever and it just feels powerful destroying targets and clay pigeons, but there is not a valid excuse to own an assault rifle outside of recreational purposes.

You guys have been watching too much Red Dawn.
 

LesMore

Top 8 Injustice Frosty Faustings VII
You guys have been watching too much Red Dawn.
Also 1 quadrillion internet points to anyone who can get a .gif file of C. Thomas Howell shooting the rocket launcher in that movie....
I almost broke the slow mo on our family VCR from replaying that scene and the ghost from three men and a baby...
 
Jojo, I love you, but this excuse is the lamest one I get from people.

If we go to war with our government, you know, us militia? We are outclassed as fuck. They have tanks, missiles, bombs, etc, etc. Assault rifles would only prolong the inevitable. LBSH

And even if we did go to war with our gov't -- which is very unlikely -- do you not think people would be able to access assault rifles? All military personnel from high ranking officials to grunts aren't going to turn on there own people to kill them. Defects would happen, and I'm sure people would acquire guns. Plus, many of us our stockpiled on weapons too. Montana came in 3rd with 25, 745 per 100,000, with Kentucky and Utah coming in 1st and 2nd respectively. Montana has a population of just over a million, and this was a statistic in 2010. You can't tell me that you WON'T have weapons available to fight your make-believe war.

"Well, it's my right as an American citizen to own whatever firearm I want". This excuse is also lame. I could make the same argument. "Well, it's my right as an American citizen to own a tank", or "...explosive bullets", or "...a nuke", etc. Where do we draw the line?

Don't get me wrong, I go shooting all the time. I love it! It's a great stress reliever and it just feels powerful destroying targets and clay pigeons, but there is not a valid excuse to own an assault rifle outside of recreational purposes.

You guys have been watching too much Red Dawn.
There is no point in making assult rifles, etc, illegal for good.
The only thing that will do is make innocent people even more vulnerable.

Criminals will be criminals and will find a way around it.
The only people that will be armed with Automatic weapons, will be criminals.
 

nwo

Noob
Jojo, I love you, but this excuse is the lamest one I get from people.

If we go to war with our government, you know, us militia? We are outclassed as fuck. They have tanks, missiles, bombs, etc, etc. Assault rifles would only prolong the inevitable. LBSH

And even if we did go to war with our gov't -- which is very unlikely -- do you not think people would be able to access assault rifles? All military personnel from high ranking officials to grunts aren't going to turn on there own people to kill them. Defects would happen, and I'm sure people would acquire guns. Plus, many of us our stockpiled on weapons too. Montana came in 3rd with 25, 745 per 100,000, with Kentucky and Utah coming in 1st and 2nd respectively. Montana has a population of just over a million, and this was a statistic in 2010. You can't tell me that you WON'T have weapons available to fight your make-believe war.

"Well, it's my right as an American citizen to own whatever firearm I want". This excuse is also lame. I could make the same argument. "Well, it's my right as an American citizen to own a tank", or "...explosive bullets", or "...a nuke", etc. Where do we draw the line?

Don't get me wrong, I go shooting all the time. I love it! It's a great stress reliever and it just feels powerful destroying targets and clay pigeons, but there is not a valid excuse to own an assault rifle outside of recreational purposes.

You guys have been watching too much Red Dawn.
Many Americans in the military wouldn't fire on their own people. Secondly, gun owners GREATLY out number the military.

Let's just hope it never comes down to a civil war, because MANY people will not be turning their guns in. Even if most do, A LOT won't.
 

ETC AdmiralAugustus

Grabble Frazzled
There is no point in making assult rifles, etc, illegal for good.
The only thing that will do is make innocent people even more vulnerable.

Criminals will be criminals and will find a way around it.
The only people that will be armed with Automatic weapons, will be criminals.
This is true, criminals will find away around it, and obtain assault rifles, but wouldn't you want harsher punishment for criminals who owned those guns? I mean, a person is just as capable of shooting a criminal with a pistol\shotgun\rifle than somebody with an assault rifle.

The fact they are limiting high capacity magazines is because who actually needs 30+ rounds a clip if you're not using your gun recreationally? Nobody.

We are a militia, not a vigilante group.
 

TakeAChance

TYM White Knight
These arguments always break down into this:

Republicans vs Democrats

Socialism vs Democracy

Protection vs Assault

Unfortunately what it never breaks down into is that guns kill people. People pull the trigger, but take away their guns, and the deaths shrink dramatically. The United States has a mentality of fear, and that is why people want their guns. They want them for protection, but unfortunately, they just end up protecting them from other people who have guns.

It's an unfortunate circle of death.
 

nwo

Noob
This is true, criminals will find away around it, and obtain assault rifles, but wouldn't you want harsher punishment for criminals who owned those guns? I mean, a person is just as capable of shooting a criminal with a pistol\shotgun\rifle than somebody with an assault rifle.

The fact they are limiting high capacity magazines is because who actually needs 30+ rounds a clip if you're not using your gun recreationally? Nobody.

We are a militia, not a vigilante group.
In New York they are now talking about banning 10 round magazines (they aren't called clips by the way). So once you give into the "who needs 30 round magazines" argument. Then it becomes "who needs 10 rounds for hunting" Governor Cuomo just said this literally in a speech last week. They want 7 round magazines in NY now.
 

ETC AdmiralAugustus

Grabble Frazzled
In New York they are now talking about banning 10 round magazines (they aren't called clips by the way). So once you give into the "who needs 30 round magazines" argument. Then it becomes "who needs 10 rounds for hunting" Governor Cuomo just said this literally in a speech last week. They want 7 round magazines in NY now.
I know it can be a slippery slope, but fuck it, it's New York. Who cares?

rev0lver