Temp
Salmon. Otters. The Bringer.
This "Kabal levels up our community" logic falls into a bit of a regress. Sure, people will get better fighting Kabal. You know who's also gonna get better? Kabal players. Fighting games are ALWAYS better with more balance. The logic of "we need Kabal" implies that if there wasn't an OP character in the game, NRS would need to put one in. I don't think anyone really believes that.
Hell, you think some of the MvC2 guys didn't have this logic? You think Sentinel's OP'ness made Ruby players better? No, it made them OBSOLETE. They didn't level up enough, and they never will. At the end of the day, Sentinel has more tools. Is Kabal as good as Sentinel? Probably not. Can Kabal be beaten? Sure... for now. Kabal isn't fully developed yet, though. For all we know, these 7-3 match-ups could be 8-2 match-ups in a year.
For the record, I'm against the ban because farming out Kabal is going to help develop a better MK10. MK9 is great, but it's had its run. Let the "Kabal experiment" continue so when the next installment comes, NRS will have a roadmap on how to create/balance a game where we never have to deal with this shit again.
Hell, you think some of the MvC2 guys didn't have this logic? You think Sentinel's OP'ness made Ruby players better? No, it made them OBSOLETE. They didn't level up enough, and they never will. At the end of the day, Sentinel has more tools. Is Kabal as good as Sentinel? Probably not. Can Kabal be beaten? Sure... for now. Kabal isn't fully developed yet, though. For all we know, these 7-3 match-ups could be 8-2 match-ups in a year.
For the record, I'm against the ban because farming out Kabal is going to help develop a better MK10. MK9 is great, but it's had its run. Let the "Kabal experiment" continue so when the next installment comes, NRS will have a roadmap on how to create/balance a game where we never have to deal with this shit again.