I think what you're saying is clear...but you're saying it in the context of talking about a video game that has been purposefully designed to be more dark/macabre. It's like going to a horror flick and saying 'Man, I just don't like being scared out of my wits anymore.' The only response you'll get is 'Great...so why are you here?'.Where did I say playing MK will turn you into a killer lol. I've been playing these games since MK1 was released on SNES and I was skipping class when I was like 8-11 years old to go play MK2 and UMK3 at the arcades. I turned out ok I think rofl.
I get that violent video games and movies are all about catharsis. I just don't really get turned on by gratuitous gore violence. There was a point in my life where I loved this kind of stuff. But now I think it's more fun and entertaining when it's cheesy gore meant to be taken lightly and with humour. Not when it's realistic, dark/macabre and super serious.
men?This is like saying, does street fighter need ryu and men, or does marvel need spiderman. LBSH MKs fatalities are a damn trademark, asking if we need them shouldn't be a question BC they are going to be included anyway.
So? You can be a fan of MK and not like/care about the more gruesome fatalities. I love the characters, the universe and the gameplay of MK 100 times more than the MK9/MKX fatalities and I definitely think MK would still be just as fun -maybe even BETTER without them because then they'd put more time into gameplay, story, netcode, QA and various modes.The only response you'll get is 'Great...so why are you here?'.
Minority opinions matter.So? You can be a fan of MK and not like/care about the more gruesome fatalities. I love the characters, the universe and the gameplay of MK 100x times more than the MK9/MKX fatalities and I definitely think MK would still be just as fun -maybe even BETTER without them because then they'd put more time into gameplay, story, netcode, QA and various modes.
Of course that puts me in the minority and yes my opinion doesn't matter because violence/gore sells just like sex so they'll keep doing it. Whatever, I don't care either way.
Fixed lolmen?
Because characters are the same as an added superficial gimmick that has no real bearing on the actually gameplay?This is like saying, does street fighter need ryu and ken, or does marvel need spiderman. LBSH MKs fatalities are a damn trademark, asking if we need them shouldn't be a question BC they are going to be included anyway.
Ed Boon's opinion doesn't matter either.Minority opinions matter.
You're making a mountain out of a mole hill here. Also, the "time could be better spent" argument falls on its face because it's completely valid to say fatalities are a core part of a Mortal Kombat game. Ed Boon's opinion matters more here than yours or mine, and what would his answer be if you asked him if fatalities were necessary? But that's not even the crux of why the argument falls flat - "time could be better spent without x" inherently comes from an opinion. Me? I would argue that I don't give one shit about the story mode - if they just cut that out of the game, they could put more time into balancing game mechanics. But that argument holds no water either, and you will never see me making it in any sort of legitimate sense.
No one's questioning whether you're a fan of MK. Why would they? Makes no sense.
*facepalm* what he's trying to say is that characters that are the faces of a franchise like ryu and ken are as recognizable as MK's fatalities because as everyone associates ryu and ken with street fighter, everyone associates mortal kombat with fatalities. A street fighter game without ryu or ken in it would just feel wrong just like an MK game without fatalities would just feel wrong.Because characters are the same as an added superficial gimmick that has no real bearing on the actually gameplay?
Like others have said it's purely a marketing plot designed to generate hype and sales.
You must not understand what I'm saying lol. Ryu and Ken have been in every street fighter like all MKs have fatalities. Your going to expect it to be in whether anyone wants it or not. Its not like you HAVE to do them anyways it gives you the option to do it or not lol.Because characters are the same as an added superficial gimmick that has no real bearing on the actually gameplay?
Like others have said it's purely a marketing plot designed to generate hype and sales.
Media in general has become more violent, which is probably why the fatalities have turned out how they have. Yes, if you have some sadistic person who enjoys watching people get decapitated they'll get a kick out of it, just like they'll get a kick out of watching someone get their face sawed off in a horror movie. But for the rest of us, these over the top scenes of violence aren't that scary and or disturbing, because they are so unrealistic. Unless you really think a person can rip another's heart out?Snip
Ryu and ken are not analogous to fatalities, that would be scorpion and subzero. The two faces of the franchise that have been in every game.You must not understand what I'm saying lol. Ryu and Ken have been in every street fighter like all MKs have fatalities. Your going to expect it to be in whether anyone wants it or not. Its not like you HAVE to do them anyways it gives you the option to do it or not lol.
no no no... no flying to the sky, no big lightnings, no; make it look simple but at the same time awesome, without "overthetopness". That is what is needed, we need back those fantastic ideas, like MK1 scorpion fatality, you don't get impress because you watch your opponent burning to death, suffering, yelling or anything like that; you get impress because first, you discover scorpion isn't human; second, he can throw fire from his skull; and third, the fire is so powerfull that there is just bones left after he killed you (no blood in all that btw). This is what needs to be brought back, no pointless nonsense overthetop gore....Raiden: Raiden flies up into the sky (huge cinematic), and summons lightning down on you as you get electrocuted and explode.
Simple, with some silliness mixed in.
Well fine replace them with supra and ultras if it makes you feel any better, point is if something is recurring in a game and has been in all of them, you expect it to be in the next version or debut of the series.Ryu and ken are not analogous to fatalities, that would be scorpion and subzero. The two faces of the franchise that have been in every game.
And I couldn't care less about fatalities, I know I don't have to do them, and I completely understand the appeal of them to the casual player base, so I am not advocating thier removal, but it's silly to think that fatalities add anything to the game play, the thing that actually matters in a fighting game.