Make sure it's on game mode and the PS3 is outputting at the korrect resolution.ok i just bought one.. i discovered that i have a issue with playing on these monitors. things seem laggy to me, but its clearly me.. so im going to get use to playing on these monitors.
I don't know of any significant differences but the 23" is what you will find at most tourneys so it's good to have to be used to. Last tourney I went to I don't think I held a combo the entire time because of the difference from my 32" to playing on that, HUGE difference in that particular case. But for me, use what the tourneys will be using and that way when I lose it's because the better man won, and not because "wtf why can't I catch him with f2 vicinity blast?!?"Just wondering, why is the 23 inch size so heavily emphasized? Does the picture quality degrade on larger/smaller monitors?
Also, are there any significant differences between the LCD, LCD/LED and LED versions of these monitors? (besides the backlighting)
Thanks.
Try this website DJ L Toro.Does anyne know how the rebate thing works. I just got my Asus and idk how to get the rebate. Please help.
I'm thinking of getting the VW246H, I guess the only difference is the size of the screen
http://www.microbytes.com/product_info.php?manufacturers_id=&products_id=31953&osCsid=588923f66241a875879ca8afb8cc077f
KRYS9984
Did you keep the default settings?
Game mode 720p I believe.what setting should i have it set to?
mode wise i mean i have it on game mode atm.
Very good question. I am honestly looking for a new PC Monitor to buy that I can also use for my games. I want something bigger then the ASUS 23 inch everyone else uses. I would love to hear what everyone else thinks of this monitor .Are these still considered to be the best monitors? After realizing how awful the lag is on my lcd tv at home (it took getting bodied at my local tourney by lagless setups for the first time) I am looking to get the best setup possible.
This Asus 27" LED has 1MS response time. This should be even better than the ones in the original post here right? I'm just curious since this thread is a year old now. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236302
Thank Christ, there is someone around here who actually knows what they're talking about.everyone should read this thread before posting questions here, it answers a;most all of the ones you can think of:
http://shoryuken.com/forum/index.php?threads/sub-1-frame-hdtv-monitor-input-lag-database.145141/
And remember: response time does not equal input lag! A 1ms response time could have poor post-processing
That's exactly why I asked my question, to get advice from people that know more than meThank Christ, there is someone around here who actually knows what they're talking about.
People are so often misled into thinking that a low response time means low input latency. They are not the same thing at all.
The vast majority of monitors do not advertise their input lag numbers. You have to rely on forums and review websites.
Thank youeveryone should read this thread before posting questions here, it answers a;most all of the ones you can think of:
http://shoryuken.com/forum/index.php?threads/sub-1-frame-hdtv-monitor-input-lag-database.145141/
And remember: response time does not equal input lag! A 1ms response time could have poor post-processing