I know this is a bit of fun, but does one set cement anything? Everyone can have an off day, and then there are days when someone is firing on all cylinders.
This thread is going to probably turn into a general match up chart of the whole roster, but what if a high level player beat a average player in a Ft5, and the high level player was Jade and the average guy was Kenshi? This thread as it stands is pitting, probably the best Kenshi out there against any Jade up for it, the challenge is grossly unfair.
Lets take REO and BWizz. Now with all due respect to BWizz, it's generally accepted that REO is the better player, in fact there are probably only one or two others that can give REO a run for his money in the whole community. If they both played two sets of a Kenshi vs Jade, taking turns to use both characters, and lets say REO won the Kenshi vs Jade set and the Jade vs Kenshi set, does this prove the match up is 5-5 or REO is better? I know that seems a rhetorical statement, but way, WAAAAY too often this community says things like "this player did well, not because of the character, but cause of the player" and on the other flip side, you have people saying "if Baraka beats a Kabal player, the Baraka deserves props".
I hope that makes sense.