Sablicious
Apprentice
Why should a law-abiding pre-owned purchaser of a video game be penalized by having content restricted from them? What did they do wrong? Why are they being punished? Is their patronage really that unwanted by this industry? How does this kind of philosophy reflect upon games companies? This is supposed garner trust from the consumer, that games producers' primary concern is forcing gamers into buying games at exorbitant prices? Games that are often stripped of content that's sold back the customer as DLC? Games that are 99% of the time duds; glitchy, buggy, rehashed and thoroughly underwhleming??
Sorry. I don't see any rationale here other than another Machiavellian means by which to fleece the consumer. How people are not up-in-arms, Middle-East style, is beyond me. Guess the world really doesn't comprise of 99% apatheitc, work-a-day, automaton lemmings. 21/12/2012 (for Yanks: 12/21/2011) can't come soon enough! >_>
Sorry. I don't see any rationale here other than another Machiavellian means by which to fleece the consumer. How people are not up-in-arms, Middle-East style, is beyond me. Guess the world really doesn't comprise of 99% apatheitc, work-a-day, automaton lemmings. 21/12/2012 (for Yanks: 12/21/2011) can't come soon enough! >_>