What's new

100 Men VS 1 Gorilla: Who Wins?

Who Wins?

  • 100 Men.

    Votes: 13 72.2%
  • 1 Gorilla.

    Votes: 5 27.8%

  • Total voters
    18

Felipe_Gewehr

Twinktile
I can imagine the Gorilla simply picking up a man by one leg and using them as an improved club to beat other men. If it (when) the man gets ripped apart by the repeated bashing, the gorilla can simply pick another man and repeat the process.

In a weird way, I imagine it would kinda look like Sauron in the fellowship of the ring movie intro where he sends soldiers flying with his mace swings. I truly dont think numbers alone can make the men win - not a 100 men, at least.
 

wsj515

This is my billionth life cycle.
I can imagine the Gorilla simply picking up a man by one leg and using them as an improved club to beat other men. If it (when) the man gets ripped apart by the repeated bashing, the gorilla can simply pick another man and repeat the process.

In a weird way, I imagine it would kinda look like Sauron in the fellowship of the ring movie intro where he sends soldiers flying with his mace swings. I truly dont think numbers alone can make the men win - not a 100 men, at least.
What is happening with all of those other men when the 1 guy is getting picked up? How does the gorilla have space to even swing their arm, after committing to picking someone up?

The gorilla is never going to be able to generate force after the first couple guys - the real life frame data + physics just don't work out.

Again, I think its possible that more people die or are seriously hurt from collateral damage in this scenario than from the actual gorilla.
 

Felipe_Gewehr

Twinktile
What is happening with all of those other men when the 1 guy is getting picked up? How does the gorilla have space to even swing their arm, after committing to picking someone up?

The gorilla is never going to be able to generate force after the first couple guys - the real life frame data + physics just don't work out.

Again, I think its possible that more people die or are seriously hurt from collateral damage in this scenario than from the actual gorilla.
I'm thinking if they try to jump in the gorilla like in a rugby match, the gorilla is massive enough to just roll around/lay on his back/jump and crush most of those pilling up on him, therefore freeing him up again and giving some space for maneuvering and whatnot. There is a physical space limit on how many men can actually engage the gorilla at once (I very much doubt it is more than 15 people at once), so there's that too. The gorilla is not fighting all 100 men at once, he is fighting smaller recurring waves of them. As for if 15 men at once can incapacitate a gorilla, this is conjecture at this point, but my instincts say no.
 

Eldriken

Life was wasted on you.
I don't think a gorilla could manage to do anything if 100 people dogpiled it. Will there realistically be a scenario where all 100 people are literally dogpiled on top of it? Nah, very unlikely. It's just if you try and think of it actually happening, what could it really do about all that dead weight on it? Say the average weight across all 100 men is 150 pounds each. That's 15,000 pounds right there, which is seven and a half tons.

Hell, the weight of the people on top of everyone would probably end up crushing the life out of the men below as well.

I honestly think people could go in circles all day with this scenario. It probably all depends on how everyone decides to look at it and from what angles they're doing so from.

As @wsj515 said: there will be collateral damage. It would be impossible for that to not be the case, you know?

I simply feel that sheer numbers will win this battle.
 

wsj515

This is my billionth life cycle.
I don't think a gorilla could manage to do anything if 100 people dogpiled it. Will there realistically be a scenario where all 100 people are literally dogpiled on top of it? Nah, very unlikely. It's just if you try and think of it actually happening, what could it really do about all that dead weight on it? Say the average weight across all 100 men is 150 pounds each. That's 15,000 pounds right there, which is seven and a half tons.

Hell, the weight of the people on top of everyone would probably end up crushing the life out of the men below as well.

I honestly think people could go in circles all day with this scenario. It probably all depends on how everyone decides to look at it and from what angles they're doing so from.

As @wsj515 said: there will be collateral damage. It would be impossible for that to not be the case, you know?

I simply feel that sheer numbers will win this battle.
I stand by my take that the gorilla is actually less dangerous than the crowd crush when killing the gorilla. People just don't like this answer because its way more simple and boring.
 

PrinceGoro

Apprentice
It still doesn't matter. The gorilla takes one swing, grapples with one guy, and then they no longer have the leverage necessary to actually capitalize on their strength. it rips one guys arm out, that arm gets grappled by 3 other guys, someone is crawling on the ground getting half crushed but tangling up the gorillas legs, the gorilla pulls its arm away but now those guys are on top of it, further limiting mobility and range of motion, etc. etc. etc. - this goes on and on, the gorilla just gets consumed.

A gorilla might be able to bench 1800 kilograms, but they're not lifting 1800 kilograms that are distributed in very unbalanced ways, all over its body, constantly moving - it will take much much less weight then that, they just won't have biomechanics on their side.

The guys in the back aren't just going to stand there - they will be crawling on top of each other, trampling each other, in order to get at the gorilla.

Grapples with one guy?? You do understand a gorilla would swing its arms in a half circle back and forth 1 time and insta kill/ knockout dozens of men if they are bunched up and all rushing like you suggest.

And as for grappling, you think you can pin a gorillas arm against its body and hold it there so it cant generate force? Lol

You are getting the logistics of the amount of people being able to accsses the gorilla completly wrong, you wont have 40 people all able to jump on the gorilla and pin its arms? Only a few people at a time would be able to be in contact and its not nearly enough to overpower the gorilla to the point it cant even move its arms...

Idk how to illustrste to you the strength discrepancy, like imagine rico verhoveen vs idk 50 5 year olds.

I think the 100 men win after gasing the gorilla out, this yolo dogpile strategy from a weight stand point does make sense but idk how well it could be executed, as well as requiering 100% fearless and un wavering men.
 
Last edited:

Felipe_Gewehr

Twinktile
I think it would be cool to have a physicist do some math regarding the area of contact a gorilla has available for men to pile on. Assuming the gorilla is a perfect sphere...
 

Juggs

Lose without excuses
Lead Moderator
Trying to envision how this would actually look, it’s kinda hard to imagine. Every time I think about it, I picture it in movie form. And what I mean by hard to imagine is specifically a bunch of humans trying to fight a Gorilla completely unarmed. It’s such a ridiculous scenario that yeah, it’s difficult to imagine it.

I think a much harder matchup would be 100 unarmed men vs a Grizzly. I still think the 100 men could win if they weren’t afraid to die and all worked together, but I think it’d be significantly harder to take down a Grizzly