Anyone saying MK1 isn't neutral-heavy probably isn't very good. Or isn't playing against good players (and not watching tournaments, either). It's common to see high level matches go down to timeout because both players are playing footsies, and both are aware that giving up a whiff punish will cost them the game.
No one has to like every game, but if the criticisms show a lack of understanding of the game itself, most people can't take them seriously.
What being "good" for you....means? The situation you are describing is from two people that consider the video game their "job", and spend hours of their days trying to counter act like....button mashing on neutral.
And still.....they can pretend to dance a lot on the screen....you know how the match ends. Is MK....is going to end with some bullshit.
No my dear, I don't need to waste my life on a practice of a game like this to see how ridiculous that is.
"Anyone saying MK1 isn't neutral-heavy probably isn't very good."....This statement itself is saying that if you criticize the game you are not good ahhaah....everybody besides this forum knows how ridiculous NRS games are, and how stupid and unbalanced these games are.....but if say it I'm bad, because I did not waste my life on practice after losing to a Raiden / Cyrax pre patch blocking it and noticing how absurd the situation is.
If you take somebody that is good at neutral, and you fuck with the frame data and give plus frames where it should not exist, it turns into a battle of bullshit knowledge and which bullshit I'm gonna use, and how my bullshit is going to surpass the other bullshit from my opponent....this is literally MK. Who bullshits better wins.
We can't forget that we are consumers and WB is a company (not your family) and this is a video game (not your job).