This whole thread hurts my brain. Shazam, as far as we see him now, is probably the best depiction of the character to date. He's a 14 year old kid that just got super powers, that's how he's going to act because he hasnt grown up yet so idk how kid in movie=directed towards kids that's like saying movie about serial killer=directed towards serial killers or hell we'll go with a legit example that's like saying because there are fish people in Aquaman, its directed towards the fish population. This is what Shazam has been for a pretty long time, its been a story about a kid learning to deal with his super powers which is going to include kid hijinks.
So, lets talk about how dumb thinking Black Panther is a rip it Aquaman. During 1966, the year of Black Panther's first appearance, Aquaman was way more focused on just defending Atlantis. I obviously havent read every single issue of Aquaman from the 1960s but if you look at it, he didnt exactly do a lot of integrating with others due to the fact that he was busy beating up random invaders of Atlantis so that point is invalid and, well dumb cuz Black Panther started off in this way. Their own mythology um...that's every comic ever idk how long it took you to pull that on from the depths of your anus but it might be the weakest point. Advanced technology is a similarity, you've got me there. The rest of the points are TECHNICALLY correct. Yea, those similarities exist but if you think Black Panther, a comic book specifically designed and created to be a commentary on how blacks were treated in 1960s America while also giving them a a hero to look up to while tackling specific race issues at the time, is ripping from Aquaman and the often campy defending of Atlantis during the 1960s then I honestly have no clue what you're smoking. Can you give me some? I need to take the edge off.