Sage Leviathan
I'm platinum mad!
No, I would not.
I'd give a reason, but everyone thus far has hit the nail on the head.
I'd give a reason, but everyone thus far has hit the nail on the head.
Perhaps with a subscription, there would be a better service within game.
Bro....lay off that shit youre fucked up on.Everybody hated the MK9 Kombat pass.
It seems that in order to play MK10 we will need:
PS4 - £350
PS+ - £40
MK10 - Potentially £50 for the Vanilla game -------------------- That's £440 already.
( Not forgetting MK10 Kollector's edition which could be £100 )
The Kombat Pass was basically a key, you could play Offline fine, but in order to play Online, you needed to pay an extra £10 to unlock the Online features that were on your disc, hence their unpopularity. My idea comes from an MMO viewpoint....
Instead of having a Kombat Pass, which I think has been scrapped for PS4 anyway, you purchase the game and then pay £10 a month to play Online. The money from this £10 a month sub fee could be used to help pay for balance patches to maintain the game. You could argue that WB/NRS has loads a money and should pay for patches themselves.... Look at Injustice.... Since IGUA came out, all the attention has been for that game. People would still be playing MK9 if it had up to date patches. Will die MK10 when Injustice 2 comes out?
$10 a month to me is steep, but If they do something like XBL where you pay once and it lasts you close to a year or whatever, then sure. NRS is not godly rich like Capcom/Namco and it's pretty obvious people don't understand this
WB probably can yeah, but if I want a better server, I could pay a small amount. If you have a job and want a better product, I would just pay and be done w/it? And we are talking IF this were an option, I doubt it would even happen, but since WB is only NOW caring about NRS/Fighting Games again, we'll see. They still have a ways to go but better online play, I would gladly payMaybe NRS isn't, but WB, who owns them, could eat any of the other big publishers out there alive.
Seriously, funding isn't an issue here.
The difference is that an arcade game is a pay-2-play game that you normally would not have the ability to play within the comfort of your own home and a console game is a 60 dollar product you purchase, which should be a complete product. SC3 is irrelevant to this discussion, yes so they screwed up, which does happen, but we as consumers should not have to suffer money gouging schemes on a full retail product.TheSpore why is this any different than games from the arcades? Arcades patched the shit out of games. You think SF2CE was patched? Bison was one of the most godly characters in any fighting game. This has NOTHING to do w/anything from the past. Soul Calibur 3 released on PS2? I can't put in words how fucked up that game was. It was so bad they made a brand new arcade version, but the damage was done.
It's just the way games have always been, it's rare a developer releases a game w/no issues