What's new

UPDATE: Boon reveals clue #6: Olivia Newton John - Can you figure it out?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Saboteur-6

Filthy Casual
I just assumed that there was a comic character named "The Peacock" and comic-dom didn't let me down. Here's a longer Peacock bio similar to the one posted. Basically she's:

Comic series: Batman (5 issues)

Alignment: Vigilante (teams with Bats vs the Sensei in the story arc)

Background: Rich Chinese industrialist mogul Sasha Lo

Powers: Martial artist, refined agility (catches an arrow fired at her mid-air), looks fancy.
 

Saint Op Omen

Savagely beating his super-ego with his id...
I just hope he dosent drag this out too long ....anything past at least saying when they will say who it is this Tuesday is to long...

Sent under duress.
 

LOCO

DADDY BARAKA
power girl
came from a star
gets her power from the sun which produces a rainbow spectrum of light

then red hood and

SUBZERO CUZ BOON IS COLD BLOODED
 

cpmd4

Slaughter is the Best Medicine
Sometimes I feel like DC gets more flack than Marvel for sex appeal.

Granted Marvel has some characters that pull it off tastefully but it like come on they still have characters who....don't. Emma Frost anyone?
I think it's deserved. Sure there's Frost and Psylocke, but then there's also Rogue and Storm. How many DC females can you name that aren't sexualized? Especially come New 52, I can't think of any that aren't sexualized or were changed to be more "ideal" in appearance.

For example, Amanda Waller is not sexualized, however, she now has a perfect figure in the New 52 opposed to being previously overweight. I mean, maybe Catwoman? (Scratch that, I googled "New 52 Catwoman" and well... you can go see for yourself)

I will admit that I am not very familiar with a lot of DC outside Batman. But the same goes for Marvel and X-men and I can name more tasteful females in that by far. Not saying that Marvel is guiltless, I just think that they at least have some redeeming characters that I don't see in DC and that's why you are seeing more flack against DC.
 

gosoxtim

Kombatant
The NBC video is making me think it's Black Canary since she was announced to appear in Arrow Season 2, which is an NBC show. Looking at The Cars Album and the songs are making me think Black Canary as well.
Sorry arrow is a cw show
 

DarkPage

Kombatant
I remember an NBC show called the cape, and like premiered a preview on a dc comics app. It was a dude with like a magic cape. Dr fate? Ehh maybe
 
Doesn't matter to me as I am up for more DLC characters. MMH is so much fun. They did well with Batgirl, Zod, And MMH so 3 out of the 5 released aren't bad.

I dislike scorpion only because he is dull to play. Lobo is ok but I don't play him as much as my favs
 

Living Corpse

Champion
I think it's deserved. Sure there's Frost and Psylocke, but then there's also Rogue and Storm. How many DC females can you name that aren't sexualized? Especially come New 52, I can't think of any that aren't sexualized or were changed to be more "ideal" in appearance.

For example, Amanda Waller is not sexualized, however, she now has a perfect figure in the New 52 opposed to being previously overweight. I mean, maybe Catwoman? (Scratch that, I googled "New 52 Catwoman" and well... you can go see for yourself)

I will admit that I am not very familiar with a lot of DC outside Batman. But the same goes for Marvel and X-men and I can name more tasteful females in that by far. Not saying that Marvel is guiltless, I just think that they at least have some redeeming characters that I don't see in DC and that's why you are seeing more flack against DC.

That was such horseshit. I legit flipped out when I found out they made Amanda Waller skinny.:mad: Catwoman I'm pretty meh on cause sex has always been one of her things and as long as that isn't her only deal like a one track pony then I really don't see the problem.

It'd be a lie to say Storm and Phonix don't play up the sexy but gangerous bit but I think part of the reason they Marvel get's less flack is they still show some restraint a lot of the times barring some exceptions like Emma Frost.

What's wrong with Psylocke?
 

cpmd4

Slaughter is the Best Medicine
That was such horseshit. I legit flipped out when I found out they made Amanda Waller skinny.:mad: Catwoman I'm pretty meh on cause sex has always been one of her things and as long as that isn't her only deal like a one track pony then I really don't see the problem.

It'd be a lie to say Storm and Phonix don't play up the sexy but gangerous bit but I think part of the reason they Marvel get's less flack is they still show some restraint a lot of the times barring some exceptions like Emma Frost.

What's wrong with Psylocke?
Psylocke is often a go-to gal as evidence for over-sexualizing women in comics, that's why I used her. I guess it has to do with her Cammy-esque unitard that shows some cheeks. I don't think she's so bad personally.

I guess you are right about Catwoman. It's true, she's a pretty well-established, deep character. It's just the comic strips I saw were a little over the top. Though, I suppose using google image search those are the most popular images to find. There weren't a whole lot, either. And with comic characters I guess it's hard to really tell if someone is intentionally sexualized. Is Spiderman sexualized? Batman? They wear pretty tight, revealing outfits. They are no worse than lots of females who might be quoted as sexualized, in my opinion. And then there's Nightwing.

I just think DC is going backwards where Marvel is going forwards. That's why I'm fine with Emma Frost/Psylocke/etc., because they also have females who are strong and don't have their bodies as their defining feature, like you said showing restraint. There's a new all-female X-men book coming out that's got some women writers/artists on the team who are looking to give girls role-models they can look up to. On the other hand, DC is making Harley Quinn wear less and less clothing, making a typically large woman have large hips and a tiny stomach, and closing every women's pants store in the DCU due to lack of business. I mean, who even wears pants anymore amirite..? Anyone...? :p

So to round up my feelings, I'll say that sexualized females (and males) are a-ok in my book, as long as that's not the only type of females (and males!) that we get. And you're right about characters with depth. Hell, all characters should have some depth to make them interesting. When the only thing that's interesting is their bodies, that is the problem.
 

Living Corpse

Champion
cpmd4

Well yeah that's why I used Catwomen as an example. She started off as lets have a sexy evil lady wearing tight cloths for the sake of having a sexy evil lady wearing tight cloths. She got more depth later on.

Sex is fine as long as that's only one part of the character, not the whole picture.

And Wolverine is pretty sexulized for a guy in comics.:p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.