should i buy mk4 for n64

[mneb430]

i have it for ps1 but heard tis better on n64 is this true should i get it

 

[dreemernj]

If you really like MK4 it's probably worth it. The graphics are better on N64. I don't know if the gameplay is any better though. And having both is cool because then you have the FMV endings from PSX.

 

[w1nter warz]

i would get it for my n64 but i dont have my n64 with me right now
never played the ps1 version but the n64 version was pretty good
u still get the same type of endings but the graphics for it are gameplay graphics not fmv

 

[RoGE]

graphics look good on the N64, the problems are that you can't save the endings and the fact that your crappy on the N64.
PSX gots worst graphics but very good FMV endings and you can save them.
N64 version has NO loading times.
I'd say the N64 version is ok to go.

 

[Sir-Jabs-Alot]

I vote yes, mk4 is awesome.

Infact I need to rebuy it

 

[Kazlaz]

that was the mortal kombat that i played for 2 years it was fun good fatalitys buy it and enjoy it lol

 

[Tim Static]

I'd say forget the 64 and get MKG on a Dreamcast with the arcade stick.

But thats just me. :wink:

 

[RoGE]

If you got the PSX version then there is no real good reason to buy a similar version with a view different things.

 

[MKF30]

If you really like MK4 it's probably worth it. The graphics are better on N64. I don't know if the gameplay is any better though. And having both is cool because then you have the FMV endings from PSX.

The N64 has the FMV endings that the arcade had just like PSX, only difference is the save option.

Just played some MK 4 before actually lol.

For the thread topic, I'd definitely buy it. It's great and overall much better then the PSX version :wink:

 

[DarkMoon]

MK4 PSX and N64 do not have the same endings.


But as Tim said, why get any of them when there is MKG for dreamcast.

 

[MKF30]

If the PSX plays the arcade endings, then they both have the same endings. The N64 plays the video endings just like the arcade versions.

I played the PSX version a long time ago, hated it but from what I remember they had the video endings too so why would they be any different?

 

[Tim Static]

The only PSX MK worth a shit is Trilogy, and that game is so fucking broken, its almost not fun sometimes.

The PSX versions of MK3 & MK4 are fucking TERRIBLE.

 

[DarkMoon]

If the PSX plays the arcade endings, then they both have the same endings. The N64 plays the video endings just like the arcade versions.

I played the PSX version a long time ago, hated it but from what I remember they had the video endings too so why would they be any different?

The PSX and N64 endings are not the same. Period.

 

[TheRagingStorm]

The only PSX MK worth a shit is Trilogy, and that game is so fucking broken, its almost not fun sometimes.

The PSX versions of MK3 & MK4 are fucking TERRIBLE.

True, but I'd rather watch a crappy ending in MK4 on PSX than to hear a story while I look at a stupid Kata in the MK Armageddon ending.

 

[dreemernj]

Mk4 for n64 uses in game graphics for its endings. Same with the arcade.

Mk4 for Pc and psx and mkg for dc use pre-rendered. The prerendered look A LOT better. But considering the quality of the psx and pc graphics overall, they dont seem worth it to me. Especially since now you can just go and watch them on youtube anyway.

 

[MKF30]

If the PSX plays the arcade endings, then they both have the same endings. The N64 plays the video endings just like the arcade versions.

I played the PSX version a long time ago, hated it but from what I remember they had the video endings too so why would they be any different?

The PSX and N64 endings are not the same. Period.

No..They both have the Same STORYLINE endings.... oll: despite how they look, they're accurate to the arcade MK4...what else do you think I'm talking about?