Hardware wise, yes the PS3 is better - better priced too. But, I don't care to start a console war here, mainly because I don't like consoles; if you've got the money (outside of FGs of course and cowadoodie) you'll have a better experience with PC gaming. I bought the PS3 to function mostly for blu-rays and netflix in my living room, FGs and the exclusives are a plus.
The only thing I care to play on 360 is the Gears of War series, but that doesn't justify buying the console with poor hardware and poor quality control. Of which I then need to pay yearly for to even stream netflix; no thanks.
But really, when we're talking hardware here and quality control, it's just facts. It's like debating Kingston ram over Corsair; buy the Corsair.
Unfortunately, even when it comes to PC gaming, a lot of PC games are console ports now because developers are lazy and don't want to push the capabilities anymore. Mainly this is because the 360 and PS3 make them substantially more money, there's not much of a market for PC games these days, and with the economy the way it is piracy is a lot more rampant. So, it's a shitty situation, would I like a reason to crossfire top of the line video cards? Hell yes. Is there any actual reason to? Hell no.
Anyways, there's no reason to get your panties in a bunch over horribly outdated hardware crammed in a little box, they're both dated. The PS3 has just held up better and they appear to have better quality control. I've owned a 360 as well, RRoD within a few months. Happened to all my friends and plenty of other people I've known. Statistically, the PS3 hardware just holds up better.