coolwhip
Master
In this particular context, all we are is gamers. We play a game, and as we're playing it we form an opinion. A gamer should not mindlessly accept any game he or she plays, and therefore, criticism is well within our rights (we're paying for it). Now, if I sit here and claim that I can do a better job than most video game companies at developing a game, I'd be lying. But the fact that I'm not a video game developer does not mean I don't know what I'm talking about if I say I didn't enjoy a game (though I maintain, Destiny IS enjoyable, just highly flawed).Wow what a line. Very well said.
It's also the main principal that I disagree with most on.
Thank you for pointing this out, I think this is probably why I get so upset with people. Just a difference in philosophy.
Let me ask a question: Why is it that the philosophy of having to be a chef to judge a meal ONLY applies when someone has a negative opinion? If all we are as gamers is armchair critics when we "hate" on something (which might be correct), then we're also armchair critics when we praise something. Why do we not know what we're talking about only when we criticize?
For the "you have to be a chef" philosophy to work, it has to apply both ways, both when it comes to praise and criticism, otherwise, you shouldn't be saying the game is great the same way we shouldn't be saying it has its flaws.
That's how I view it at least.
Last edited: