Frankly I don't feel it matters if you "surprise" your opponent with it, or if they're not ready for it. It is slow enough where you can not be expecting it, and stilll be able to break it on reaction. I fear that, offline, this move has been neutered to the point of complete uselessness.
I completely agree, and this is one of the things I brought up when talk first started about nerfing it. The CG does a very small amount of damage. If it doesn't set up giving cyrax an advantage, which effectively just turned into "setting up the bomb trap," then there's absolutely no reason at all to ever even use it. Even if it doesn't get teched, why on earth would you use it?
The tech windows were changed and the damage reset was as well. This is perfectly fine. But with thse two things in place, why does it make sense to take out the bomb trap entirely?
It's not like you can break other characters big combos by teching the starting hits and saving your meter. These corrections are completely overkill..
It's too bad that NRS can't figure out that making a mechanic change that fixes something DOESN'T mean they need to further correct something that's already going to be fixed.
Hell, I wish I could tech the first hits of Ermac's 47% combo without using my meter to break it. Actually, scratch that... Give me the ability to do that, AND take it out of the game completely! yea! that makes sense!
Seriously.... What's hard to understand about this? You don't need to take something completely out of a game if you've already made two corrections to fix it....
I think boardwalk in monopoly takes in too much money and it's imbalanced. solution, make it take in less money. Not a solution - make it take in less money and also remove it from the board.
@ colt: What exactly about a throw that is now the easiest to tech in the entire game, plus a following combo consisting almost entirely of breakable strikes is "guaranteed damage?"
that's like saying, "sorry Ermac isn't going to have a b + fp that's guaranteed 43 - 47% damage."
Does that make sense? no it doesn't... neither does claiming that a command throw is guaranteed anything.
sigh....