What's new

The portrayal of women in video games.

To me sexualization is hardly a problem,

Americans seem to have this obsession with oh noes naked/private parts.

People are attracted to attractive people. It's something people enjoy.

As long as no one is being forced to watch "gasp" cleavage

and as long as no one is being forced to show them. what's the harm? If you're talking about people subconciously looking at women a different way because of this, then you should direct your focus on teaching the difference between a fictional video game world vs reality. and teaching that aspect to those who aren't smart enough to tell a difference.







The problems with gender in the real world are much larger than this.

women make less money than men on most jobs of the same work level.
many members of the republican party try to make women seem like "they should be home ridden and not have dreams in the workplace"
Abortion rights


you should worry more about this, than a fat kid fapping to CGI boobies. It's evolving slowly in the masses and women are getting more and more respect.

I'm not directing this post at anyone just talking in general about some points I came accross.
 

Relaxedstate

PTH|RM Relaxedstate
by feminist i mean i believe in equality, not privilege. i dont think guys can complain either. for example (note i'm assuming you're somewhere near my age) do you remember "pantsing?" this activity was one where one boy (typically) would sneak up behind another boy and pull down his pants. this was only possible if the boy who got pantsed was not wearing a belt, so in a sense he has no right to complain. it's the same thing. now i'm not saying if a girl has a skirt up to her panties go ahead and get a feel (i wouldnt want to anyway), but if guys are going to look at her exposed privates they absolutely have no right to complain.
also, it's important to define what it means to be objectified. if you can do that for me i can respond more specifically
Yes, lol. I remember that. But it is still not my fault for 'not' having a belt on. It is the asshole who pantsed me.... in any regards, this logic is hurtful for more serious and dangerous gestures, like sexual objectification. Speaking off, I could give you a solid definition, but at this point I would rather just direct you to a fantastic resource on the issue:

http://www.barnesandnoble.com/listing/2687700885854?cm_mmc=GooglePLA-_-Book-_-Q000000633-_-2687700885854&cm_mmca2=pla&r=1

Naomi Wolfe is a big figurehead of 3rd wave feminism. You would probably read some chapters of this in an intro to women's studies class. Regardless, you will learn all about sexual objectification, the male gaze, slut shaming, sex positivism etc... I recommend it to everyone involved with this conversations! It is good man, I think you could get a lot out of it
 

STB Sgt Reed

Online Warrior
I think its because she really portrays a strong hero without the fact of her having huge tits being there. Shes got a heroic personality and a look that isnt not too ridiculous.


I don't think this is as ridiculous as say...
Right, I'm just sayin there's easily a happy medium where women can still be sexy and strong. No need for the extremes of lolol look at dem tits or lolol super mech suit, she r strong. :)
 

Compbros

Man of Tomorrow
The media where women are most objectified is usually dominated, or so we assume, by the male demographic: Video games, comics, even movies/tv can fall into that with certain programs. Meanwhile, even when women aren't being objectified in movies they're usually ditzy/clumsy/given an exaggerated "strong woman" role or just downright stupid (romantic comedies, Twilight, etc...) and women don't even seem to mind. Media rarely portrays strong, smart women with sex appeal because men don't care, we want "hot" chicks and women don't care because they still eat this crap up.

So why should ANY media outlet change the tried and true "sex sells" since no one really takes a look at how women are looked at in media.
 

Compbros

Man of Tomorrow
Right, I'm just sayin there's easily a happy medium where women can still be sexy and strong. No need for the extremes of lolol look at dem tits or lolol super mech suit, she r strong. :)

Jade from Beyond Good and Evil comes to mind. Smart, strong and appealing without needing 80 percent of her skin showing.
 

GrandMasterson

The Netherrealm beckons
People are too sensitive and politically correct these days.

Also, the problem I have with Anita is that she's only addressing one small issue of video games and blowing it out of proportion like it's the main issue. If she really cared about video games, she would talk about how the industry is currently being dumbed down with "oh so realistic cinematic gameplay, press X to win" nonsense for the CoD audience.

Nevermind the bigger problem that video game writing in general is garbage, and that goes beyond the simple "women are stereotyped" rhetoric. No shit? Why doesn't she talk about the bigger issue?

The reason is simply because she doesn't actually care about video games or the state of the industry; she just sees them as a vehicle for furthering for own stupid agenda.
 

Mikemetroid

Who hired this guy, WTF?
Only one?
What about Metroid 2? Huge boobs and a thong.
Metroid and Metroid II are before her character were developed. Super Metroid and then on out she really didn't appear that slutty. Even then its not like she fought and did everything looking like that.
 
Yes, lol. I remember that. But it is still not my fault for 'not' having a belt on. It is the asshole who pantsed me.... in any regards, this logic is hurtful for more serious and dangerous gestures, like sexual objectification. Speaking off, I could give you a solid definition, but at this point I would rather just direct you to a fantastic resource on the issue:

http://www.barnesandnoble.com/listing/2687700885854?cm_mmc=GooglePLA-_-Book-_-Q000000633-_-2687700885854&cm_mmca2=pla&r=1

Naomi Wolfe is a big figurehead of 3rd wave feminism. You would probably read some chapters of this in an intro to women's studies class. Regardless, you will learn all about sexual objectification, the male gaze, slut shaming, sex positivism etc... I recommend it to everyone involved with this conversations! It is good man, I think you could get a lot out of it
no, if you know your peers are immature idiots who want to pants you (why the fuck is pants a verb... you know our society is dying when... but anyway) then it's entirely your fault for empowering them to do so. belts are like 5 bucks, is there really that much difficulty in getting one? By the same note if a girl knows her peers are sex-minded idiots and she wears skirts up to her vag and tube tops daily then it's her own fault when guys dont look at her face when they talk to her. Sorry, but in my opinion you are what you present yourself to be. one has no right to complain about being sexualized if one sexualizes themselves. that's an unacceptable double standard.

Honestly, i really hate when i ask a question (not including any thing that starts with "do you know of any good literature on") and it's answered with "read this book." As a philosopher i already have a large reading load and i am already read on a bit of feminist theory. if instead you tell me "the definition i will refer to is ________ as said by _______ on page ___ of their book ______" that's fine because i get what definition you're defending, but telling me "get ______ book" doesnt give me anything for 7-10 business days in which time the discussion has already ended.
 

BillStickers

Do not touch me again.
no, if you know your peers are immature idiots who want to pants you (why the fuck is pants a verb... you know our society is dying when... but anyway) then it's entirely your fault for empowering them to do so. belts are like 5 bucks, is there really that much difficulty in getting one?
Yes, because forcing a child to spend money to protect one's self from humiliation is *definitely* more reasonable than teaching good behavior and disciplining those who misbehave.

Please, never ever ever call yourself a feminist.
 
Yes, because forcing a child to spend money to protect one's self from humiliation is *definitely* more reasonable than teaching good behavior and disciplining those who misbehave.

Please, never ever ever call yourself a feminist.
it's not a dichotomy, people should be responsible for creating a situation where they will not be "humiliated" and people should be taught not to humiliate others. It's dumb to just place the blame on others though. there's a reason the saying "the opportunity makes the thief" exists. So yes i think 5 dollars of a parent's money should be spent on belts so that a child's pants are not on the ground.

what's wrong with calling myself a feminist? I am a feminist, but i am also a pragmatist. that's the main problem with the history of the feminist movement: they have been too idealist to the point of counter-productivity.
i'm going to leave this here because i think it's very powerful:
 

Gesture Required Ahead

Get on that hook
Uhhhhh Lollipop chainsaw was a straight up parody. Everything about the game was supposed to be taken as a lighthearted joke.

Its like the same argument that Bayonetta is a sexist game (big surprise its not).


AC had Lucy. Also has ezio sister and Caterina.
Halo has Cortana.
No I meant, AC , Halo and CoD don't exploit women.And then saying that CoD doesn't even have women.Besides the pilot that died in CoD 4 I guess.
 

Hitoshura

Head Cage
She makes great points, but what she doesn't realize is that no matter where you go there will always be that one person who was not hugged when he was young or who was beaten by his alcoholic father. A person when at the age of 5 watches his mother get abused by his very own father. Why am I making these points when it doesn't relate to the topic you may ask?

It does however relate b/c these mentally skewed people do something we all know as "bullying". A large # of kids who perform acts of bullying have problems at the home or with themselves and tend to take it out on other people. Now that the internet has grown at such a large scale bullying can now be done digitally. The only difference now is the number of people who bully others increases due to the ability to hid behind an invisible wall. Bullying has been and will always be a problem in this world and that will never change. Whether its remarks at someone liking a certain movie, game, band or being of the opposite sex.

Am I not sympathetic for what happen to her? Of course I am! What happened to her was just wrong on various levels, but that's the internet for you. As soon as someone puts anything on the internet involving something controversial, something ground breaking, or even something personal you better expect the entire world to come at you. Putting yourself on the internet is like being locked in a room with a group of people who haven't eaten in days and see you as their next meal. You should expect what going to happen especially someone of her intelligence who is familiar with the media we use on the internet today (4chan, message boards, etc.)

Another point I want to make is that yes its a little ridiculous how most females in video games are dressed very promiscuously, but in this day and age sex sells. As silly as it is to say sex sells in all forms of media. What makes a game awesome in the eyes of the public besides explosions, zombies, blood, and cinematics? Over sized Breasts and hips of course! Most gamers in this day in age are Male whose mindset has been dumbed down to enjoy sheer simplicity. (I don't want to go into details why this is true b/c that's an entirely different topic) With that being said all these gamers care about today is Action in the form of "Shooting shit", highlighted items and solutions to puzzles, arrows guiding you were to go, and tits. The capitalist know this and make their yearly profits off of the minds of these simpletons. This will not change unless the majority of the gaming market changes and seeing how the minds of people are developing in today's society there is no hope.

In the earlier years sex in the media was not as prominent as it is today. Things like music, games, movies were made to deliver messages, to prove points, or to even inspire. Now we have musical artist like little wayne singing songs about "Popping Pussy" Rick Ross singing songs about how he is extremely overweight ans hes a boss making "Big Money" while repeating the same dame beat in every single one of his songs. We have movies were it literally is just points scenes of dialogue and explosions. Games....I don't want to go into that b/c id have the users of TYM reading for a while.

Basically the entire point of this long convoluted post I just made was to state that the interest of the common people have been changed to something more simplistic and barbaric, and that the internet is a cesspool of mentally delusional human beings who get their sick kicks at poking fun or ruining the lives of others.

This women can try all she wants and I fully support her cause, but it won't change a thing. In the end Sex sells and there's nothing we can do about it. Only way of changing that is if the mindset of the modern day gamer changes and focuses on something else entirely, but to hope for positive change with these people is just surreal.
 

Rude

You will serve me in The Netherrealm
Another question: So for every one recognizing that the portrayal of women in games isn't always fair...

...and there are exceptions to this...

What do we do from there? How do we affect change?

Should we?
 

Relaxedstate

PTH|RM Relaxedstate
Sorry, but in my opinion you are what you present yourself to be. one has no right to complain about being sexualized if one sexualizes themselves. that's an unacceptable double standard.
Wow. People may be what they present themselves to be.... but they should be able to present themselves any way they want to! (without fear of being shamed, or worse raped...) The real DOUBLE STANDARD here is that men (from a heteronormative standpoint) do not have to worry nearly as much as women do about how they present themselves. They can go out however they want, and not have to worry about violations (Unless they forgot to buy a belt!!!---insert sarcasm). The bottom line is that women should NOT have to worry about being raped for how they want to present themselves. Unfortunately, we live in a world where women DO have to worry about this. The least you can DO is to NOT blame the woman. She should be free to wear what she wants with out fear... It is unfair that we live in a world where women do. But I know we live in an unjust world where people like you want to blame and shame her further. It is messed up man, if you can't see why, than we are done here....

As a philosopher i already have a large reading load and i am already read on a bit of feminist theory.
= LAWL. From my perspective, you have probably read a wikipedia page and watched half a youtube video regarding feminism.
Trust me man...wait the 7 business days for the book. It is worth it.

Edit: Since this is also a MK forum. I challenge you to a 100$ money match at the next tournament we are both at. WB, FR, and MLG Columbus?
 

Justice

Noob
I'd like to start off with the fact that I love women. ALL women. It is with this love in mind that I say: Equal rights is right. Feminism is glorified male bashing.

I think the larger issue here is how we as human beings percieve our own bodies. A good example of this just a few posts ago when talking aobut Samus's end game image.

Only one?
What about Metroid 2? Huge boobs and a thong.
Metroid and Metroid II are before her character were developed. Super Metroid and then on out she really didn't appear that slutty. Even then its not like she fought and did everything looking like that.
Seamus is automatically characterized as "slutty" simply because she is in her underwear. I don't see anything slutty here. Sure, there is a lot of skin on display, but nothing really suggestive going on. I have seen a variety of posts in this thread similar to this that show that people on both sides of this argument don't understand exactly what it is they want or are fighting for.

My take on the female view of this subject is that these same females that are devaluing their own gender arguably more than males are simply by focusing on the fact that the women portrayed in various media are attractive and know how to flaunt it. There is no discussion about the character's strengths, flaws, or anything else. They are simply written off as fanboi eyecandy or fapping material.

Now, before you go off on me as a pervert or sex fiend or mysogynistic pig, let me give you an example. I love the Soul Caliber series and I main Ivy. Now in SC2, Ivy had a one-pice bathing suit made of leather for her armor. Given her weapon of choice and watching her move, it is totally realistic that Ivy would wear something like that since total freedom of movement is what keeps her alive so wearing restrictive battle armor would not be a smart idea. Also, Ivy is and extremely smart woman in addition to her more visual assets. She would well know that in a profession such as hers, the majority of her opponents would be male. It is reasonable to assume that a revealing (read: distracting) attire choice; it could mean the difference between life and death in battle. SC3 had a similar-styled outfit but with more thinner material and some sections that were see-through. Still not overtly sexual, but admittedly heading in that direction. I could defend these attires. SC4 comes out and even I had to throw my hands up and admit defeat. That attire was just too much fanservice. These are discussions on this subject that just don't happen. Noone analyzes why the characters are dressed like that in case there might actually be a good reason for it and then they can't assault it.

My mom is such a strong individual that I'm sure Xena Warrior Princess would run scared from her. From what I am reading here, I should never have been born since my mother is considered by many as attractive: successful, strong will, charismatic, with at least a DD chest. So my mom shouldn't have been objectified and desired because she possesses all of the traits that men look for in a perfect mating partner?

Actually, speaking of my mom, here's a funny story from when I was younger. I worked for a time as a movie extra. I wanted to be an actor/model myself. One of my first gigs was on this movie that was set in the modelling world. I was doing this scene that was backstage at a modelling show and there was a lot of professional models running around in their underwear. I'll be honest, I nearly fainted when some came close. No butchy, alpha male here. Anyway, after I got home, I called my mom (this is after years of her giving me her opinions on models, the modelling industry, etc.)

Me: Hey mom!
Mom: HI hunny! How'd it go?
Me: Hey mom, you remember all that stuff youtold me about models not looking like their pictures?
Mom: I lied.
*both of us laugh*

To try to wander in the direction of back on topic, in North America we live in a conservative majority. There are so many people out there telling us that our bodies are disgusting and that sex is bad and so on. So it's no surprise that we look for it in the pages of Playboy or Hollywood films or even our video games. What's the best way to get someone to do something? Tell them they aren't allowed. the big crime here isn't adult magazines, movies or games, it's the fact that there's noone putting it into perspective for us.

Look at the pages of "the bible": Cosmo magazine. All the images there are of physically "perfect" specimens of femininity. They tell us that if you wear this perfume and that hairstyle with the other dress and no man will resist you. What noone is telling you is that you don't need to look exactly the same as that model to be attractive. It's like us playing MK: you train and level up to be better and you keep a picture of a good player you respect in mind to emulate. Same thing here. These magazines give suggestions and tips on how to improve YOURSELF but neglect to remind you of this. So women get depressed and have warped self images because they don't look like the girls in Cosmo when noone is really expecting them to.

Another issue I see happening (well it's basically the same issue but a flip side of it) is the cattiness. The whole disregarding of women in the advent of plastic surgery and Photoshop. I think that it's really disturbing that both men and women assume that a woman with breasts bigger than an A cup have to be surgically enhanced. Angelina Jolie must have botox since lips like that don't fall from tress. Why can't a woman be that attractive naturally? Why can't Denise Milani, Jordan Carver and Leanne Crow have all-natural FFF breasts? More importantly, why do they have to be attacked by both genders because of what they were born with?

All this to lay the groundwork for the topic at hand.

I think it was Mayo that had it half right when he said that women in games were fantasies. The entire game is a fantasy! Where in the real world are you gonna see Reptile running around force balling a 4-armed dragon-woman? Gaming is an escape, a release; along with comics, movies, etc. What people don't focus on is that fact that both male and female characters are just as objectified as the other gender is. The difference being is the social mores of the audience. As was also mentioned earlier in this thread, pretty much through the entireity of human history, males have been the "dominant" gender (and I use that term extremely loosely). So the perspective is that while men use their sexuality much the same as women do, it is socially acceptable for men to do so simply because it's been like that for hundreds of years.

Some examples to illustrate:
  • A top male executive that is promoted because he still has a full head of hair. He is still seen as being young and virile.
  • A man with a good physique wearing a shirt a little tighter than normal to the office to impress the new hottie at reception or to make a sale with a female client.
  • Shannon Tweed dating Gene Simmons simply because he was a world famous (and rich) rock star. She admitted in an interview that she never would have looked at him twice if he wasn't.
Compare these to:
  • My cousin, who was working as a waitress at the time got a rare evening shift (she usually worked days). She undid one extra button on her blouse knowing she would get bigger tips.
None of these examples involve anything sordid. In fact, they are all quite innocent. But I bet that everyone's natural reaction to reading these noone thought to blame the male in any of them.

Now how does all this insane ranting relate to girls in gaming? Simple, it's how we view it. The men are just as objecified. The victory poses are just as silly as the females', they just aren't the exact same poses. Seeing Mai Shiranui do Blanka's victory pose is just as stoopid as seeing Bass Armstrong bouncing around like Chun Li.

The entire thing is a fantasy. The males are alpha-male examples of what men are told we are supposed to be just as the women are alpha-female examples of what women are told they should be. Once again with noone telling us that we don't NEED to be like that. Gaming is also a strange dichotomy in that while we know it isn't real, it affords us the oppportunity to "simulate" what it would be like to be a Duke Nukem or a Lara Croft or whatever character that you secretly wish you could be like or would like to emulate in your real life. Would you really like to play as a fat, out-of-shape sweathog or your bon bon-eating ugly step-sister? Neither would I. Another thing to consider is, presumably you will be spending many hours playing said game. Wouldn't that time go by faster with something visually appealing in front of you? If any of you dare try to lie I'll upload my vid of when I opened my first stick. I accidentally mis-framed the shot and got like 3.5 mins of my fat, furry gut.

My personal pholosophy is: KNOW what you're getting yourself into when you make decisions and take responsibility for your part in it. I believe that a woman should feel comfortable and safe enough that she could go to a club wearing nothing but stilettoes and a smile and not get attacked. By the same token, if said female was to decide to do this very thing, she has to understand that people will be looking and talking about her. Now I'm not saying it's anyone's fault, it's just knowledge of human nature. Here's another example:

My roommate has an attractive daughter. They would go to the mall to shop and sometimes she would purposely walk a few steps behind her daughter, just to see all the boys checking her out. Then later, they would talk: "Did you see all those boys looking at you?" "Yeah mom. And it's pathetic". My response to that is: "If you don't want the boys ogling you like that, then why do you spend 2 hrs in the morning on hair and makeup?" It's like sitting down to an awesome dinner and someone tells you you're sick because you feel hungry. Take my earlier example with my cousin; she wasn't doing anything overt to gain extra attention and money, all she did was leave one extra button undone and conducted herself the same as usual.

Now that I've wandered back off topic, basically the whole thing is made to be a bigger deal than it really is. We just need more people to remind us that it's just a game/movie/show and that we are beautiful human beings JUST THE WAY WE ARE!

But if you really want something to complain about, let's talk writing. 3rd Birthday on the psp or the upcoming Toumb Raider reboot as good examples of weak and rapeable characters that need to be re-rewritten....
 
Wow. People may be what they present themselves to be.... but they should be able to present themselves any way they want to! (without fear of being shamed, or worse raped...) The real DOUBLE STANDARD here is that men (from a heteronormative standpoint) do not have to worry nearly as much as women do about how they present themselves. They can go out however they want, and not have to worry about violations (Unless they forgot to buy a belt!!!---insert sarcasm). The bottom line is that women should NOT have to worry about being raped for how they want to present themselves. Unfortunately, we live in a world where women DO have to worry about this. The least you can DO is to NOT blame the woman. She should be free to wear what she wants with out fear... It is unfair that we live in a world where women do. But I know we live in an unjust world where people like you want to blame and shame her further. It is messed up man, if you can't see why, than we are done here....

= LAWL. From my perspective, you have probably read a wikipedia page and watched half a youtube video regarding feminism.
Trust me man...wait the 7 business days for the book. It is worth it.

Edit: Since this is also a MK forum. I challenge you to a 100$ money match at the next tournament we are both at. WB, FR, and MLG Columbus?
i agree, rape is unacceptable, but how people present themselves affect how people are perceived.
i dont like the picture of woman as the powerless victim. power isnt something that is possessed it is fluid and exercised at every level of interaction (foucault). you can believe what you want, only thing i checked on wiki today is spike's VGA results, but they're not up yet. i'm actually a philosophy student and i have actually been reading massive loads of theoretical literature for 8 years now. sure only a bit of that is actually feminist theory, but a large portion at the very least interects with feminist theory in a fundamental way.

as for the money match maybe if it's a $5 match, but even then probably not. I play the game for fun, have been since may. i'll happily play you in casuals though. btw what happened to grudge matches? i remember back when challenges were done for the right to talk shit and not for money...
 

peachyO

Noob
You know, it's so sad if "scrawny" dudes feel inept due to society. I'm a big dude, 6'2, 190, and I just dated a skater would was sexy as fuck...but was considered scrawny...i think they are adorable! ;)

edit: *who was sexy as fuck* damn phone
you are preaching to the choir...slender skaters/stoners/surfers are what i LIVE for!!! and at 6'4", 365lbs, no need for them to be greedy, i gots more than enough to feed the needy!! ;)
 

BillStickers

Do not touch me again.
what's wrong with calling myself a feminist? I am a feminist, but i am also a pragmatist. that's the main problem with the history of the feminist movement: they have been too idealist to the point of counter-productivity.
i'm going to leave this here because i think it's very powerful:

Sorry, but Crittenden's view of the world is horribly, horribly misguided and framed around her own Cinderella story of marrying a wealthy man in her 20s that could afford to support an entire family by himself. Are you even taking a step back to analyze her premises? Women do not become unmarriable after 29. The era of the stay-at-home mom, contrary to her belief, was a fluke in history that only occurred due to post-World War II economic prosperity. Her notions are based purely on misogynist thinking and 1950s nostalgia.
 

Goldi

Noob
I got pantsed in an elevator at Final Round. Some people are just ... Not right. He goes, "you have sexy hip bones!" And then yank! I was like eeep! And just pulled my shorts back up.

In retrospect, I should have bitched him out a little or at least told the TOs. But I was really new to the FGC and just grateful it wasn't worse. As it is, I think he was just a drunk idiot who got handsy . I do not think it was my fault. I wasn't wearing a belt, but long sleeves and khaki shorts that showed a sliver of my lower stomach and hips depending how I stood. One player later said I was dressed like a slut, but I can't see it.

ETA; This is why objectifying women in video games doesn't phase me. They're not real people. Do whatever you want to imaginary characters, freedom of expression, don't censor art all that. There's enough jack asses and misogynists attacking and harassing and pantsing living women, why would I care about Lara Croft when I've got my own safety and well being to worry about. Let her wear her stripper boots and shoot mummies and jump 8 feet in the air and be and look as fake and fantasy as her creators want IMHO.