I think many of you are missing the point of what
@ZeroSymbolic is saying.
Never once did he say that the work isn't hard or the hours aren't long, or that the treatment is poor.
What he said is that there are people that CHOOSE to work longer hours for LESS money and CHOOSE not to complain.
If the stories about the treatment at NRS are true, then nobody should be treated that way at work, regardless if they chose the work or not.
HOWEVER, there is accountability on the people who made a choice to work at a dev studio. There have been decades worth of stories about crunch, about the hours and the sleepless nights. Do not let the people who are complaining go completely without accountability here. If the work was too much, if the crunch was too much, if the hours were too much, nevermind the treatment as that is an entirely different story, then these employees had the CHOICE to quit.
Treatment is an entirely different animal. If some of the threats are true, it would be a HR and potential legal nightmare for the studio. The best possible scenario for this is, if the stories are true, then NRS needs to get out in front of it, own up to it, properly compensate those who are deserving, and blaze the trail of changing the crunch culture.