Lisbeth
Kitana stole my sai
you won me over hereAlso, surprise, Cetrion is the most boring character in the whole damn fighting game universe.
you won me over hereAlso, surprise, Cetrion is the most boring character in the whole damn fighting game universe.
I don't really wanna start this whole discussion again, but there's a pretty big difference between a Bruce Lee/Van Damme archetype and literally dressing a character like a stripper. Bruce Lee was considered sexy without being sexualized.. They didn't have to turn him into Magic Mike to have him be an attractive lead. That's a far cry from where most of the female outfits have been, so I just don't think it's a sound comparison.Yo, Ive held saying this bluntly back, but tonight Im on one.
Sex is okay. Being sexual is okay. Liking sex A LOT is okay. Being gay is okay. Being straight is okay. Being both, or trans, or pan, or asexual is okay. The idea is to include everyone and not to exclude anyone. If you are hate talking toward people who want to see tiddies and that juicy bootae, youre just another part of the thought police. I like to think, somewhere, theres a world where guys are fighting for characters like Jax to not have abs because it portrays an unrealistic body standard and objectifies men. Honestly, I myself am a classical feminist. Any person, man, woman, even Mileena player be able to earn anything they are capable of earning and respect them and treat them as they wish to be treated. But that does NOT mean, I am to pretend I dont want to see them Naked. Especially if its just some game Im playing PURELY FOR ENTERTAINMENT. Also, its not even weird to be turned on by picels. Some people atre genuinely into hentai and the like. Its certainly an option on tabs when Im on Pornhub. Theres a market. Lets all be adults. This game is rated mature, lets act mature. Men are half naked. Liu, Jax, Johnny, others, so women can be too. Its fantasy. To please us. Game of thrones doesnt HAVE to show tits and sex and John Snows ass, but it does. Because people love it. I want Mileena with big ole tidders and idc who knows it.
Rant over.
Also, surprise, Cetrion is the most boring character in the whole damn fighting game universe.
It most certainly is a sound conparison, and if you cant see that, I feel sorry for any woman you interact with. Have you ever met a stripper? Talked to one? Actually gotten to know one? Some, many even, are empowered by what they do. The stereotype isnt the be all end all. 100% action heroes, including Bruce Lee, are shown topless and at low body fat percentages for visual appeal. There is not combat advantage to being that ripped. Watch actual combat sports. You lose stamina and endurance.I don't really wanna start this whole discussion again, but there's a pretty big difference between a Bruce Lee/Van Damme archetype and literally dressing a character like a stripper. Bruce Lee was considered sexy without being sexualized.. They didn't have to turn him into Magic Mike to have him be an attractive lead. That's a far cry from where most of the female outfits have been, so I just don't think it's a sound comparison.
Also, to reply to your edit, yes MMA attire, how much of the thigh or cleavage is covered by that, exactly?I don't really wanna start this whole discussion again, but there's a pretty big difference between a Bruce Lee/Van Damme archetype and literally dressing a character like a stripper. Bruce Lee was considered sexy without being sexualized.. They didn't have to turn him into Magic Mike to have him be an attractive lead. That's a far cry from where most of the female outfits have been, so I just don't think it's a sound comparison.
If you look at female MMA outfits, you can see a good example of what fighters actually look like (read: not bikini tops and thongs)
As always, if it actually fits the character's origin, that's different. But forcing overt sexualization in "because female" is pretty silly.
Absolutely! But its okay to play a character you wanna masturbate to as well. Im a grown man, and I dont have to be immature about the fact that sexual arousal happens for many people for many different reasons. Is that too taboo for the people of Evil Canada?Its ok to be able to play a character without having to jerk off to them.
over here its taboo and shameful to talk about how much you are angry video game characters do not meet your masturbatory needs, yes.Absolutely! But its okay to play a character you wanna masturbate to as well. Im a grown man, and I dont have to be immature about the fact that sexual arousal happens for many people for many different reasons. Is that too taboo for the people of Evil Canada?
Well, Im not angry at them not meeting my mastubatory(not a word at all) needs. Im angry, and only mildly so, at the vocal crowd of people shouting, “lul cuck u cant play wit ur smol dick now haha its game respek female.”over here its taboo and shameful to talk about how much you are angry video game characters do not meet your masturbatory needs, yes.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/masturbatoryWell, Im not angry at them not meeting my mastubatory(not a word at all)
Fair enoughhttps://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/masturbatory
looks like your FACE isn't a word bitch haahHAHAHHA
In my defense, Im stupidhttps://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/masturbatory
looks like your FACE isn't a word bitch haahHAHAHHA
Not really, they're actually legitimately good.Jacqui's skins are alright. I think the NRS employees kinda overhyped them.
I always preferred how games like King of Fighters handled it.I don't really wanna start this whole discussion again, but there's a pretty big difference between a Bruce Lee/Van Damme archetype and literally dressing a character like a stripper. Bruce Lee was considered sexy without being sexualized.. They didn't have to turn him into Magic Mike to have him be an attractive lead. That's a far cry from where most of the female outfits have been, so I just don't think it's a sound comparison.
If you look at female MMA outfits, you can see a good example of what fighters actually look like (read: not bikini tops and thongs)
As always, if it actually fits the character's origin, that's different. But forcing overt sexualization in "because female" is pretty silly.
No it's not.Its ok to be able to play a character without having to jerk off to them.
I would argue such outfits fit the female ninjas, whom always wore a leotard-like outfit since MK2, plus their agility and everything, combined with the fact that Edenians tend not to wear a lot of clothes. It was only in MKX they started changing that.I don't really wanna start this whole discussion again, but there's a pretty big difference between a Bruce Lee/Van Damme archetype and literally dressing a character like a stripper. Bruce Lee was considered sexy without being sexualized.. They didn't have to turn him into Magic Mike to have him be an attractive lead. That's a far cry from where most of the female outfits have been, so I just don't think it's a sound comparison.
If you look at female MMA outfits, you can see a good example of what fighters actually look like (read: not bikini tops and thongs)
As always, if it actually fits the character's origin, that's different. But forcing overt sexualization in "because female" is pretty silly.
Except bale chested males intent is different from the intent of skimply dressed females. When ever people see a bare chested, muscular male in action movies, they are never seen as 'sex symbols' the way expsed skin dressed females. It's seen as masculine and heroic to the majority of the audience whereas a female fighter showing lots of skin is seen as a sex object. Ask any woman what a sexualised male might be in their mind and they aren't going to be mentioning 'Khotal Khan or 'Kano' the way nerdy males talk about Ivy Valentine. Its something like a sensetive male wearing a sweater and flowers on the cover of a magezine. Sure, ppl CAN be sexually attracted to bare chested males but generally the intent of their design isn't to be for sexual enjoyment. So the whole 'double standard' statement doesn't really work in terms of tropes, and is an emergency-pull chord argument I see most players use at best.Funny how I always saw Mortal Kombat characters as something like He-man, the He-man/She-ra situation. Both are equally dressed scandalously.
Dudes look like Adonis with most (~70% percent the last time I checked) of them having bare chested options (some even pantless) and their designs have followed the historical design philosophy of male MK characters: strong, muscled, great physique that they show off.
But not the girls, they're dressed even more conservatively than MKX which I don't really get because I think MKX did a really good job at distancing itself from the skin clad designs of MK9 which was NRS' goal while still being very ''tastefully sexy'' and as far as body shape goes none of them looked very conservative, some had their curves and looked very good, a happy middle-ground.
And the most important thing, MKX outfits were interesting looking, now some characters look so boring that they look like npcs. I think MKX nailed it with Revenant Kitana and Vampiress Mileena.
It's just a giant false equivalency. Fighters never wear shirts. Not in Boxing, not in MMA. But they're also not sexualized. Doesn't mean that they can't still be sexy or whatever, but it's not the main point.Also, to reply to your edit, yes MMA attire, how much of the thigh or cleavage is covered by that, exactly?
How much sense does it make for Jax to wear an open vest with no shirt underneath even though he is supposedly a member of the straight laced super Army our bare no skin lady pal Sonya is? You are looking through traditionalist eyes that are trying to bend to a progressive light. Trust me homie, aint nothing wrong with a lil thong n bra on a pixelated ninja princess. There will always be alts for the ones who dont like it. Liu Kang has armored, cloth, and bare chest skins and he shines as a very divers character. The females suffer from diversity. Only so many ways you can cover them completely. Lmao.